Whats funny about that? We're a very poor team.

You seem intent on belittling anything anyone posts which isn't wildly optimistic. Do you honestly believe that last night's performance was better than we've seen in recent weeks? Other than, perhaps, less dropped ball, we didn't look any different to me. They also have the worst defence in SL by some margin yet still kept us scoreless for the whole of the 2nd half. Be as positive as you like but don't dimiss the opinions of those of us who have removed our rose tinted specs

Jeez. Anybody happy and content with last nights performance has some serious expectation issues!

I will gladly take the 2 points and a few positives but crowds will dwindle if that is the quality of rugby served up at the KC for a fact.

Spot on, makes us all bad fans though you know for not being happy!!

Remember, all some people care about is finishing about Celtic!

or so it seems

Get your head out of your ar$e, and actually read some of the posts people are writing.

Like I said, you had several top players missing.

It was a scrappy game between two poor sides, but you came out on top.
When you get the better players back you have to trust in the coaching staff to produce better Rugby. If they still play 5 drives and a kick then you can moan but when you are on the slide and have players missing then surely it is more important to play up the jumper and grind out a win at, lets remember, a side who beat Leeds and Hull the last few weeks.

I agree we had some quality players missing and everyone is hoping they make a massive difference if/when they return.

The main issue is the quality and style of the rugby we are playing. The players are not determining this because I believe we still have enough quality to play better attacking rugby and TBF we show it in small glimpses.

It is probably just a case of giving it time then mate.

If you think the players currently on the field can play better Rugby then I can see why people complain.

However without some key players and with a couple of young inexperienced players in the team, Lee, Maloney, Burnett, Briscoe etc, perhaps Agar is looking at keeping to a simple game plan until the team picks up some confidence and experience together and gradually and more flair to the game?

Saints didnt start playing the way they do over night, it is maybe a long term plan.
Then again it could just be boring RL, only time will tell but at least you are picking up wins and staying well in touch with the play off's.

I don't dismiss anyone's opinion whatsoever but will argue against them on here if I disagree using facts that I know (not fiction) and my opinions of games as I see them.



Less dropped ball always leads to a better performance. Always has done and always will do. We moved the ball wide confidently in the first half. Struggled for field position in second half and lost a fair bit of direction. Had a 2nd half try rightly disallowed.



And also beat us/Leeds/and wire recently.



Thanks for that.



Is that not what you do too or is accusing someone of wearing 'rose tinted spectacles' not being dismissive of their opinion ?

We are average - not very poor in my opinion as our league position shows - middle. As for any other team in the league beating us I failed to see the relevance of such speculation and found it amusing. That together with the somewhat negative view that we won only because the other team were so poor made me laugh. Apologies.