It is odd how the Club Captian was asked for his thoughts on the matter, why not just say "nah it wont happen end of, would be nice tho"

But What Radders said sadly puts him up for a public flogging on here, but why?

I'm sure if Gary Neville went in the media and said "i wouldn't mind a 39th prem league game to be played in Dubai" he would not be expected to be sacked as Club Captain of Man U or the club itself would not feel the self importance to comment on the matter.

So is this Hull FC's board testing the water?

Possibly rebuild Boulevard back to 15000 (lets admit at the current prices we have hit the crowd max for us i'd say) and play 2 derbys a year in a 35000 capacity KC so us and Rovers can get the maximum income from the minimum effort? Rovers could stay as they are as 9k is probably their max crowd so no more redevelopment there.

2 monster games a year?

70000 watching Hull v Rovers a season?

Using what money?

Think it's about time Hull supporters stopped listening to Fifth Columnists that think that much of us that they can't seem to use their own forums.Stop looking back and look forward,the K.C. is the future, the Boulevard is the past.Don't let nostalgia cloud your judgement,the Boulevard would just be a millstone round the clubs neck.Stop listening to the Bandwagoners who love to come on here and try to undermine the club.Try and say anything on their site that they don't agree with and you are immediately banned.

If we left the KC, the SMC would have to pay off 20 years of a lease.

Afterall we know it's confidential and nobody here knows any terms or conditions

you may find out that radders was stitched up with the mail article,whats to say he said all of it the way the daily mail put it?

That's what my thoughts are on the matter. Nearly mail misquote from an off the cuff remark. Par for the course if you ask me.

when the KC stadium was first mutted was n't there some thing mentioned that it would only be built to home at least 2 professional clubs and if either did n't want to move in it would not have been built. i was also under the impression that Hull city council owned the ground (not Hull city) and it is managed by the smc so i wonder what the councils stance would be if ever the club did want to move?

wasnt the terms of the lease re-negotionable after five years anyway? sure i heard the club was in talks with the smc last year.

Thats what i thought .

Think you're confusing the lease with the rental/operating agreement.

Does anyone seriously believe that we would have made it to 3 finals in 4 years if we had stayed at the boulevard? The KC has given our club opportunities, commercial and otherwise, that the boulevard simply doesnt. The boulevard will always be sacred to every fc fan, but the ground was a dump. The 3d stand hasnt been intimidating for many many years. People need to stop looking back through rose tinted specs and see why we left there in the first place. A move back there takes this club back 20 years.

Loving the comments on the official Hull FC site this morning...

It seems the only person who was casting a doubt in everyone's minds was Radford!

As far as I can see the players on the pitch wearing a Hull FC shirt got us to the finals, not our ground. And I'm sure if you look at our expenses you'll see the KC is not a glittering gold pot for us, it is for others. It has become a bit of a mill stone, do you think wigan or hudders pay £2500 per game to use the scoreboard?

So if it has brought untold riches why do we have a £2 million debt with an annual income of £5 million?