add Wigan to that aswell

Just be glad we played Leeds .

Hudds would have ripped us a new one if we'd played them.

If agar were in charge of the hudds or wigan squads they'd be bottom 4

I mean life in general,not talking about rugby.

for crying out loud, when someone worries about the way agar talks

ive actually been quite pleased with our attacking this season and think we have scored some great trys as well as a willing to keeping the ball alive with offloads.

Now to our defence............. BAB lol

The way we defended against leeds, dropping off tackles and sheer stupidity is just not acceptable. Agars fault when we lose but the players are great when we win syndrome springs to mind.

Is Agar the right man for the job? im still undicided

If he was in charge of either squad he'd have been fired long ago.

The oppositions

He certainly makes us a laughing stock , who would employ some one who can't communicate? Surely the coach needs to be able to speak with a whole cross section of players under his control and needs to be a communicator of some skill to get his point across? Agar comes across in the media as a representative of my club as an unintelligible , clueless , monkey and not a manager of men who can get his point over to all the players from simple local lads through experienced british pros to exalted antipodean types. Surely to god you need to have someone who can communicate and therefore has some presentational skills for a coach? All of the evidence points to a lack of intelligence , sense , strategy , planning , education , grammar , empathy and most other words one may associate with a leader that is likely to have a chance of bringing success.

poor,poor defence,and ext predictable in attack.our defence has been at a very good standard,but i'm afraid it came down to one thing-leeds had pace,we had plodders.

"We had one set in 14 at one point and they had four back-to-ones and some penalties"

Does that make sense? Surely if they had 13 sets in 14 they must have had at least 7 back to back. Does anyone remember this period of the game as I don't remember us not getting the ball for what must have been almost 20 minutes?

Four 'back-to-one' decisions, not four back-to-back sets.

And yes I do remember that period. Even the Beeb commented on it.

He should be sacked for not making himself clear