Dear dear me....

motu, no doubt a good play, too injury prone, didnt look confident on the ball at all last nite, could have moved him to hooker maybe, think the full back roll would be to much for him, imo

Quote: dazcool " the sex scandal down in oz involved andrew johns, just as he is being introduced to his media career, thats why they rekon he'll be out of a job soon,,,,, reed the papers..!!'" www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... 563957.htm Instead of reeding try reading.

Quote: dazcool " the sex scandal down in oz involved andrew johns, just as he is being introduced to his media career, thats why they rekon he'll be out of a job soon,,,,, reed the papers..!!'" www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... 563957.htm Instead of reeding try reading.

I seem to remember this time 12 months ago when Dykes was in and out the side, and Berrigan playing at 7, all these people were saying that Berrigan should be playing at 9, the team is all the better with Berrigan at hooker.
Now I see people saying that Berrigan should be playing at 7, make up your fu**ing minds.
Instead of taking the easy option of slating Thorman, who by the way I agree was absolutely sh**e last night and yes I agree overall is not good enough for any team who wants to be classed as one of the big players, why not just accept that the club as a whole is average from top to bottom. Average board, with average coaching staff, finished off by too many average players on good contracts. I bet none of you would have the balls to call Thorman a turd or say that you hope that he get's injured to his face!
Half of you lot are just like them deluded Newcastle United to$$pots.

has everyone gone mad, the whole point, of playing rugby league is to win first and foremost, so why do we field crap players,,, second of all i know the history of the johns family, i was making refrence to the fact we have 2 crap halfs, and andrew johns with no eyes could play better than any of ours....thanks

Andrew Johns has just turned 35 and retired through injury two years ago.

Oh and Motu isn't a liability.

Mal Meninga anyone??

first of all i herd it was both the johns brothers, if not then the dentist needs to alter his diary,,,,,

secondly i would never wish an injury upon any player, and were i dont think thorman deserves to be in the hull fc squad, they could be slim pickings, for those at the craven park tip, after the dobo has been prized away,,,

johnsy maybe 35 but thorman looked 60 last nite, motu looked like he needs some vallies.....

Why is Motu being bagged?

Wasn't it his first game back from a pretty serious injury?

or the alternative non-abusive arguement would be that people can change their minds and through desperation some are seeing Berro as a better choice than Thorman. (but not the ideal choice as he aint a 7)

Thanks for your contribution though!!

, Just looked out of place and very nervous last nite.. imo..