Good.

A short-term sticking plaster on a long-term gaping wound. If the 1 year deal results in us using both his and Dykes' wages to get in the scrum-half we need for 2010 then it's as good as we can hope for. Viewed on its own, yet another in the growing list of underwhelming Hull FC signings.

good player, i can see why he only signed him for 1 year, because next year we bring the big guns over, i can see todd byrne and/ or webster going if offers come in, thorman covers all backs and has a good goal and free style kicking game, this allows some pressure to be took off tickle, i would now like to see the backs

Tony
Calderwood
HORNE
Yeaman
Raynor
THORMAN
Dykes

No shadow of a doubt this signing has come through Jon Sharp, but I think its a very smart signing when you look at the injury crisis we've had this year.

He can cover 1, 6 and 7, all positions which we've had major injury problems at this season so his utility value will be highly anticipated.

FWIW I think we should go with...

6. Horne
7. Thorman

Either Dykes or Webster has to go, and tbh i'd rather it was Dykes, we'll get more game time from Webster and he isn't on the quota!

We still need a new centre though imo!

rich horne would be a world class centre.. he has everything you need as a centre , pace passing and tackling... also i think thorman would be great partner with dykes and horne outside them both would be fansastic

The one year is great news for Hull, we can look for a top overseas halfback for 2010, which i think Agar will be trying to do on his trip.

Gives Thorman a chance to earn a deal, and if does well we could possible use Horne in another position. (Or this season if Dykes stays fit )

By signing Thorman we are stronger for 2009.

I think Huddersfiled have taken the wrong option and should have kept Thorman and released Robinson.

For the Rovers troll, he would get into Rovers team in front of Cooke, as he is a better allround halfback than Cooke and more consistant.

imo thorman will be back up 7,6 and 1 in that order. he isn't better than tony or byrne at full back, horne at stand off or dykes at 7 but no doubt someone will get injured so he'll give us good cover.

I'd have me in front of Byrne at FB, he offers nothing from there IMO.

Should be either used as wing cover or shipped off (if possible)

Decent value for money signing. Fed-trained, which will give you more options when you look at making a more high profile signing. Actually, could you claim him as club-trained?

No you have to be under a certain age or spent time in your youth system.

Huddersfield reasons for letting him go: giantsrl.dnsupdate.co.uk/latestN ... Index=2357

Huddersfield reasons for letting him go: giantsrl.dnsupdate.co.uk/latestN ... Index=2357

Can't say we haven't lacked organisers and a decent kicking game this year, so no arguments on that one, but this rubbish from Rule about him being a good guy off the pitch, yeah right, why was he suspended a couple of seasons ago by Huddersfield following very disturbing night club incidents with females then?

I know, but he was with the pre-merger Gateshead's academy before going to Sheffield wasn't he? You've enough homegrown players that it doesn't matter, I just wondered if could if you wanted to.