Granted, but we would have to get rid of most of the team to pay his wage

I know, I was just trying to be an annoying ****

Because a player can play well in other positions then their own does not mean they are a utility player. It means they're versatile. Sinfield is, and always will be, a 13.

You are definitely piissed....

feck it let us go the full hog bin Whiting and bring Benji Marshall in as utility

He's played only two positions his entire career.

Exactly mate, at least someone sees sense, a utility player comes handy during injuries, we want players playing in their position that they know, it's what makes a successful squad, no doubt about it! (BALANCED squad) would be the correct phase.

1. McKinnon
2. Briscoe
3. New centre
4. Yeaman
5. Sharp
6. Horne
7. Seymour
8. O'meley
9. Heremaia
10. New prop
11. Westerman
12. Whiting/New back rower
13. Tickle
14. Moa
15. O'carroll
16. Manu
17. Houghton

Briscoe, Lyne, Turner, Crooks, Nicklas, Ellis, Radford, Newton, Adlous, Green, Pearce and Cunningham to complete the squad.

It never worked, but to be fair you are up against a good clown on this thread

But he can play in different positions, so he's a utility. Whiting would not be a Utility player if we had just played him in his normal bloody position! But we couldn't because of injuries, and because of Agars clueless squad selections.

Why be disrespectful to me? I have not said a word about any other member on here. I'm just expressing my views, on a team I support. I could have called you from a pig to a dog, saying Luaki is a good player and should be given more time and stuff on the match thread, but did I?

'eh

A prop can play 2nd row so does that make them a utility player as well

You NEED some players with utility value. I agree he shouldn't even be considered as a first choice winger next season, but he covers injury reliably in a number of positions.