You mean all their birthdays came at once when they left Gateshead to go to a potentially massive club.

far from it

Somehow i don't think they would of been lining there pockets like they are here after losing a fair amount of money at gateshead.

and you have evidence that they are lining their pockets?

So how much money are they 'lining their pockets' with then? Round numbers will do.

Like any business you don't go into it to make a loss.Hull have made a profit for the last 5 years which tells me after the initial investment they put in,they are now making a tidy sum.

Not really, it was probably more that the wrong question was asked. There's (apparently) no long term liabilities in terms of loans. But as Mrs. B has pointed out, there will be plenty of current liabilities.
Of course we (as in the business) owe Kath etc, its called capital, the problem with kath, it seems, is goodwill. Kath obviously values the goodwill in the company a lot higher than potential buyers do.

So it's just an unfounded assumption then?

Thought so.

How the hell do i know?.All i know is that they have been making a steady profit and that not much reinvesting is going back into the club like getting in a world class coach,so the money must be going somewhere.

It is, it's PAYING OFF THE LOANS FROM DIRECTORS

The profit from the last 2 years was re invested into the team - Joe Westerman.

The club still has significant negative reserves so the owners cannot take a dividend. You are therefore suggesting they must all be on hefty salaries.