I'm co-director of a business turning over in excess of £1m.

I'm not having a go at rule per se, merely using his appointment as an example of the club's short sightedness in it's senior appointments. rule has also overseen thackerygate, reardongate and now blundersidegate.

And you're the one trying to score cheap points off me

Name of company, just so we can coroborate your story?

And I don't think being a co-director of a business turning over £1m is really comparabled to beig the head of a sports business turnning over in excess of £5m are comparable.

Not interested in posting my personal business on here, and nor am I saying that I'd be any better that rule at running Hull FC (If I have said that then please tell me where), merely saying that he wasn't the right appointment for a club the size of Hull FC

So, bsically, you are full of it? No problem, you're not on your own.

So, which bit of getting the A licence, having increased sponsorship, attracted big name players (even if they fell foul of immigration rules) would you change, and who would you have in the job?

Don't know who I'd have in the job as it's not my position to search out the right person. Without a detailed knowledge of the goings on inside the club it's difficult to know what I'd change

Not at all. I always try to argue a balanced view on here. Some will agree and some will disagree. Nothing wrong with that. I can easily understand how many are disillusioned with Hull FC both on and off the field. Argue your case by all means. Unfortunately for you your argument generally degenerates into name calling and such like, hence my original post in this thread. Calling people 'idiots' if they don't agree with you is hardly going to win many debating prizes. It's generally the tactic of someone who's lost the argument.

But without the same detailed knowledge you feel you can comment on somene's abilty to execute their responsibilities? Interesting.

thackerygate
reardongate
blundersidegate

and you know all the facts behnd those issues?

Obviously not, do you?

I know a few things that are not in the public domain, yes.