Sounds like we should have put 40 on Bradford. Still too many errors, is the pressure agar is feeling transmitting to the players in any way? I know it shouldn't because they are all pros so why can they not be consistant for 80 minutes at least. It sounds at times like we're playing great rugby then other times like a NL2 side!

Quite comfortable in the end but after the start we had we could have put 40/50 on them. An away win is an away win though, I'm glad my mid week predictions about us been a much better team came true .

Players must take the main responsibility for their errors.

But Agar keeps picking certain players that keep making mistakes and don't offer much else.

Like Sharp? Lauaki has been dropped this year too and I reckon he may be next week too. Fitzgibbon was moved to prop today even though many suggested that Agar wouldn't dare and Radford was also dropped for poor form.

That been said, Agar still struggles to get the players in the right frame of mind.

have we won?thought we had lost.

Your last point is a good one. For me motivation is Agar's biggest challenge and not tactics. It shows itself often in derby matches - we should want it more when we play in any game. Again a top on field vocal leader at half back would help with that.

Thinking more of Turner and Lyne, everyone can see that neither are good enough (maybe still time for Lyne) Sharp for his faults at the moment is twice the player Lyne is.

Saying that an away win without 2 pivotal players in Phelps and Long and Gleeson is a good win.

Playing badly and winning?...do for me at the mo.

Wouldn't Agar keeping Sharp in the team be him 'picking certain players that keep making mistakes and don't offer much else.'. Sharp is have a mare recently, Lynn deserved to play last week and today. As for Turner, who would you have played at centre today instead?

Probably being too over critical TBH.

Hopefully we will sign Seymour this week and announce Moa's new contract.

Also not too long to my first live game in a long time.

Well done to Hull and Agar.

I'd give Crookes a game at centre, but he won't be risked.

Despite Sharp being a bit poor recently he is better than Lyne and offers much more going forward.

well done hull............see you still cant please some people on here,

Lyne still needs to be exposed to this level but preferably outside of Martin Gleeson to help him progress but he should be better for the experience.

Sharp would be my first choice on the right wing though.

While I agree with Sharp being better than Lyne atm, surely you'll agree with the sentiment that Sharp had to be dropped and Lyne was the most viable option to replace him.