The big 4 have multimillionaire backers. We on the other hand have to be self funding.

If we announce a profit, are we not self funding?

That's the point. We have to turn a profit as we don't have a benefactor to bankroll losses.

Well on the performances being dished out of late and yet another poor showing they won’t be helping the club turn a profit only turning the fans off

Well that's everyone's choice, of course.

huddersfield have a multi millionaire backer

But they file exemption accounts.

We spend full cap and apparently have top training facilities. What difference does it make whether there is an excemption on the accounts?

I thought it was multi millionaire backers or does it now have to be high turnover AND multi millionaire backers? Can you stop moving the goalposts on this one

Eh? The Big 4 have had a stranglehold on GFs, I think we can agree on that.
You then brought profit into it, as if Wigan making a loss was relevant. They can afford losses because they have a rich backer to underwrite trading performance. We are disadvantaged because a) we don't have the size of the big clubs (turnover, assets, employees) and b) we have no rich backer so have to manage our P&L more carefully. None of which changes the fact that the Big 4 have been dominant. Now, we may well get a Cas v Salford GF this year, but I would be surprised.

We spend full cap, simple fact.

sts showed last night how poor Huddersfield are.

Can't wait for next week. No doubt the class of 2016 who are leaving will be wandering around a near empty KCOM at the end of the game

Probably also playing in a near empty KCOM

KRexit night, some are saying.