matty johns commentates too.... anno, dont think he needs to look for another job yet tho

Apart from the first 3 words that is one of the stupidest posts ever. Motu was of our best players last night and there is certainly bigger problems then Motu. Washbrook is injured so how can he play 6? You mean Matthew Johns.

Motu?! Liability?! Based on what?!
He showed great signs last night considering it was his first match back, and I was really impressed with his play, along with Raynor.

thought motu was very avarage last nite, i thought hull started ok tho.... definately not worth the space he his taking up in our squad, we lack total creativity. oh u got some obsession with matty johns..?

the sex scandal down in oz involved andrew johns, just as he is being introduced to his media career, thats why they rekon he'll be out of a job soon,,,,, reed the papers..!!

Andrew Johns is the no.7, one of the greats. Matty Johns has just been sacked from the Footy show and Melbourne Storm and he is Andrew's brother and used to play hooker.

Both of them are long retired but you carry on.

You need to back up your arguements, what made you think Motu was average?

agreed raynor had an exellent game, looks even bigger than he did last year, radders was impressive too...

Dear dear me....

motu, no doubt a good play, too injury prone, didnt look confident on the ball at all last nite, could have moved him to hooker maybe, think the full back roll would be to much for him, imo

Quote dazcool="dazcool" the sex scandal down in oz involved andrew johns, just as he is being introduced to his media career, thats why they rekon he'll be out of a job soon,,,,, reed the papers..!!'" www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... 563957.htm Instead of reeding try reading.

Quote dazcool="dazcool" the sex scandal down in oz involved andrew johns, just as he is being introduced to his media career, thats why they rekon he'll be out of a job soon,,,,, reed the papers..!!'" www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... 563957.htm Instead of reeding try reading.

I seem to remember this time 12 months ago when Dykes was in and out the side, and Berrigan playing at 7, all these people were saying that Berrigan should be playing at 9, the team is all the better with Berrigan at hooker.
Now I see people saying that Berrigan should be playing at 7, make up your fu**ing minds.
Instead of taking the easy option of slating Thorman, who by the way I agree was absolutely sh**e last night and yes I agree overall is not good enough for any team who wants to be classed as one of the big players, why not just accept that the club as a whole is average from top to bottom. Average board, with average coaching staff, finished off by too many average players on good contracts. I bet none of you would have the balls to call Thorman a turd or say that you hope that he get's injured to his face!
Half of you lot are just like them deluded Newcastle United to$$pots.