Surely Kirk can hang his boots up and we can use Miloudi who made more metres than Kirk in one run and less errors.
I would keep Connor at 6 and Scott and Miloudi in the centres and Logan and one other on the wing.
Boy oh boy we are low on troops in the back line

Big, big raps to everyone pulling on the shirt yesterday. Some of the negative comments on here are beyond belief. That was an heroic effort from everyone involved and had we had our first team out we would have put 50 points plus on the Dobbins. The uber critics on here need to rein their necks in and support the boys and the coach, who's doing a magnificent job.

To be honest for St's depending how it goes in Friday at Warrington I'd be tempted to keep it as is with Connor/Harris and have Miloudi on the bench.

I know it doesn't getting any better, but Harris is cup tied.

(ps. Shaun Wane is leaving wigan at the end of the season.)

Think we need Yeaman's defensive quality in the back line at the minute as its very inexperienced at this level. Whilst Miloudi is very good going forward and seems to be a bit of a maverick his defence is not a strong point. Considering Yeaman hasn't trained for a year and a half or played a competitive game since 2016 in all fairness he did the job that was asked and played 80mins.

Its a very tough ask for Scott & Miloudi to go up against Atkins/Goodwin and then Makinson/Percival.

Forgot it was the Cup game against St's in all the excitement.

If we had a sports psychologist we wouldn't be making as many dumb plays/fighting/giving away needless penalties/switching off as often as we do, clearly you don't get human beings.
We'd have won by more if we'd not done the same old dumb stuff, if we'd passed the ball more, instead we kept clanging it down the middle which was at times was a wasted tackle or two in almost every set.

Tactics to beat a pub team, just lol, it was purely through having a better team out, that pack was a match for any in SL but wasn't used effectively for the most part. We drew them in but then failed to get it out wide often enough.

So if you are on debut you don't trust to them and don't pass it out for them to make a play in case they fail, what utter crud, that's part and parcel of how you stunt development. It's a bit like bringing on a youngster with 5-10 minutes to go in a game you've already won (something Radford has done numerous times in his tenure), other teams/coaches put their kids in and let them play, if they make mistakes so be it but it's how we as humans develop not just in sport but in life. And if he didn't trust to get the ball out to his retiree (who was a passenger all game) why did he bother to include him at all, particularly at the expense/exclusion of someone who'd been playing regularly? The debutant was not out of place at all and would have been just fine, it's not like he isn't used to actually playing rugby, it's not like he's the first debutant in sport, there's simply no trust in the capabilities and thus as I've said all along he stunts the growth of players at the club.We simply did not use the backs effectively which is our style in a nutshell and highlights Radford's failure's,

He is so concerned with being ultra conservative that it's actually detrimental to our performance. He can't see past banging it down the middle and using brute force (hence the team he's built) too often instead of utilising the backs when we have the opportunity to do so, yesterday we could have ripped them a new one, pound them down the middle and then get it out wide, nope we went for the stale/same old and managed to scrape past including all the usual BS with regards to discipline/dumb plays which rears its head every weekend and Radford cannot/will not address but come up with some rubbish for the media.
As I said, I simply do not think he will take the club any further, I really thought at the start of the season he had turned a corner and was learning to recognise what he needs to do to improve things this and yet the Fev game (where we were opened up at the edges too easily just like yesterday) and indeed other games this season has for me nailed it that he's simply not capable of delivering us a GF winning team.

Too many on here seem to be satisfied with a back to back CC win, yes that's nice but with the squads we've had and particularly a season were we had barely any injuries and blew the potential of the treble, meh, Wigan and Leeds would say that was not good enough in 4 years.

Get an attack coach AND someone to advise him how to get the players to not just listen to what he's telling them but to strengthen them mentally to carry that out particularly in concentration through games when fatigued and the errors/penalties/discipline area which would improve us, but he won't because he won't accept his limitations. He keeps saying the same things to the media but the reality is he does not have the skillset to be able to get the players to change.

Harris can't play in the cup, otherwise I would agree

If Griffin wasn't injured I'd agree.

I forgot it was the cup game Dave K

I'm pretty sure that was him doing an ironic Mrs B impression tbf. Hence the eye roll.

If it was, then that's just another example of his obsession and inability to let things go

Spot on mal.

My my you have been busy today. This ludicrous rubbish and you have been on the Grauniad website slagging Radford off as well spouting the same drivel. Time to get that petition going again. I suppose Shaul would have got 6 tries yesterday as well if it wasn't for Radford's bullying of him. And sports psychologists now stop penalties in a fast moving, high impact collision sport - you couldn't make this up surely.

I'm sure you have plenty of examples where coaches play to their weaknesses rather than take advantage of their strengths. Hull's big advantage was in the pack yesterday and they used it well, once in front they were never going to get caught. By the same token the dobbins knew there best chance was to attack a makeshift back line with 2 centres playing winger with a debutant and a rusty retired player inside them. Sensible by their coach as well. It wasn't a great performance by Hull and it wouldn't have worked against a top 4 side but it got the points fairly comfortably. Most on here recognise that in the circumstances the coach was facing he did OK.

For the past 2 seasons only 2 sides have finished in the top 4 twice which shows its not an easy thing to do in the current levelled out Super League. Guess who is the coach of one of them?