not really no menzies ,peacock,lynch,morley,briers, would lend weight to my theory. all ages get injured, end of.

If you don't think you get injured more with age why do you think players retire in their 30s?
It's a commonly accepted fact that with age comes injuries.

So why don,t warrington get more injuries than everyone else,they have easily the oldest squad and why haven't any of the players i mentioned earlier retired yet

they retire because they lose pace and power not because they are injured

There are exceptions to every rule,picking out older players who haven't retired doesn't prove that players don't retire when they get older any more than Mike Burnett retiring proves that most players retire in their early 20s.
Age brings injuries.

And why do they lose pace and power?

It's Gareth Ellis, he's one of the best backrowers in the world.

Every SL club and the majority of NRL clubs wanted him, his age is a slight gamble.

Just bad luck. Adrian Morley was injured in his first match for Wire and missed three months. Since then, barring his eye problem, he's stayed fit, played many, many games and is still going strong at 35.

A full squad is a large exception though!
Players retire because they can't physically keep up with the game anymore as it becomes too fast for them. Joe Arundel, Richard Owen, Danny Maguire all suffered massive injuries in the last couple of years.
Any sports scientist or physio will tell you there's no correlation between age and injuries, but they do admit that the recovery process can take longer.

Ellis broke his foot in oz, this is probably similar injury. The only other real time out at wests was a dead leg of epic proportions. Bones and tendons in a conditioned athlete are not going to be stronger than they are now at around thirty, n even beyond. Not much you can do about bones n tendons, comes with the territory.

Injuries and how his body will stand up to another 3 years of top flight rugby were the only concerns with ellis. Personally, I'd rather have kept manu than sign ellis but I'm sure many will disagree

You make it sound like we had a choice with Manu, we didn't. Ellis was signed to play with him, he decided to leave.

Hate to say but your spot on,before the season I have posted on here manu is better than ellis and 95% of dullers said I had no idea what I was talking about,well I watched ellis back end of last season after his injury and he was a shadow of the great player he once was.
Manu is class and played virtually every game,you would have thought your heirachy may have learnt from previous regimes gaffs with long,dykes etc. !!

Never a choice, regardless of Ellis, Manu wanted to leave.

Well if you insist on calling Hull fans "dullers" people may have blocked you so won't see what you say. Those who haven't done that probably couldn't give a monkeys about your view for similar reasons. And I bet 95% is way off too.