Cant see the point in putting Fitz on bench v Sts.

I think putting Fitz on the bench would be suicide, he's the key in stopping Roby from acting half.

Westerman is a better attacking option, we win by out-scoring them.

Managed ok the last 2 games...and 1 was against Warrington who have out-scored teams for fun and Westerman didnt play in that game...so we out-scored them without our better attacking option.

Agreed, the captain and leads from the front.

If anything I would prefer to put him in the back row with Ticks then start him on the bench.

Agreed, all the more reason to play Westerman from the start, maybe bump Fitz into the second row, but he shouldn't start at 13.

1.whiting
2.sharp
3.gleeson
4.yeamen
5.briscoe
6.horne
7.obst
8.omeley
9.houghton
10.Moa
11.tickle
12.manu
13.fitzgibbon

subs
14.washy
15.westy
16.lauaki
17.Dowes

Great 17, and good bench, but Turner needs a run out. He hasn't played so far over the whole Easter period.

Really don't want to risk changing a winning mix unnecessarily.

That I agree with. The joys of having selection headaches!

btw: our game won't be included in either of the two weekly RL papers. They're both going to press tonight.

On the one hand I'm pleased, because I half expect a tonking, but on the other hand, it seems a bit naff to carry on like our match doesn't exist!

Just thought I'd let you know, just in case you read the RL papers.

Possibly, but the coach should never be afraid of changing a winning team.

If Turner misses out tomorrow I hope he'll get a run out in the Cup game.

For definite.

Indeed and Fitz has been fantastic particularly against Wire where the oppo fans applauded him off. Best have him on the pitch I reckon.