Think Sammut 'could possibly' develop into a decent player but would rather wait a bit longer than 120mins before commenting further. First glance suggests he needs to realise there are 12 other players around him all contributing to the cause, very singular in his game play for mine and not what we require at the moment.

Not from a results perspective. But since we're miles off the top teams anyway, he'd provide more entertainment than the rest of the team. Genius individual try or monumental cock-up - never know what he's going to deliver on the next play.

There is sammut about him,I must admit.

Boooooooooooo

I think thats exactly what we need as our whole percentage rugby is boring to watch, easy to defend against but could be excused if it was leading to 'ugly wins' but it isnt.

whiting isn't a stand off, IMO.

I've always rated myler, half backs don't reach their peak till mid to late 20's.

Does the emergence of Sammut remind anyone of how good Dobson was when he came across?

Are you saying Morgan has coached his goodness out of him?

Hardly a find, everyone knows about him. Has potential and is a good signing for Crusaders but we never had a spot anyway.

I'm still not convinced by him TBH. Monaghan and Briers do most of the creating. Myler just seems to be on the end of the final pass quite a lot.

Corrrect, Myler creates very little he is merely a support player.

We could get a world class half back and turn them into a normal looking utility though

A lot like McGuire when he first emerged IMO. Wouldn't be surprised to see him end up at 6 rather than 7.