That's the thing with Radders it depends how you look at the game. He was dependable as always, our problem is we have too many like him. Although Tickle, Dowes and Cusack are worse lately.

Fritzl ?

take Radford out of our pack and we really would be fooked

What!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

there are better players who can do the same amount of work he does, and actually have an offload/attacking game as well

he would have been ok for us until the end of the season, but extending his contract for another year before a ball was even kicked in 2009 was completely ludicrous.

OK honest question at this moment in time Radford or Tickle?

TAKE RADFORD OUT OF OUR PACK AND WE REALLY WOULD BE FOOKED,

loud enough for you.

Agreed but this is the same board that extended Dowes' contract and gave Tickle a lengthy deal on the back of 1 good season. Far too many players in our squad are in a comfort zone at the moment because of stupid decisions made by the board.

Put Radders at 2nd row or prop, and we'd be better...

I belive Ganson said he had it checked and still gave it to us.

I agree

thats what you don't see, he plays as the 3rd prop wether he be at 2nd row or LF, it's called playing the game tight, for those that want to be picky, he did pack down as prop in the 2nd half today.

Yey Farrell who is the greatest LF in SL era was not a prop, he was a great ball handling runner, a born winner and a natural leader.

Could do a job coaching for us, oh i forgot the money is too good in Union

I don't think our pack would be fooked without Radford, but I do think he's playing a lot better than Tickle at the moment. But then, that really wouldn't be difficult.

Tickle has become very ordinary of late, maybe in the comfort zone and this could be affecting his kicking, those missed today could have got us a point at least, think he has a good friday monkey on his back.