Trolling again I see!!!

Not bothered where we play TBH. The sheer variety of stadia in RL is one (albeit small) part of its appeal - love the idiosyncrasies of the old grounds and the comfort of the new ones. Can't see how the Boulevard could be brought up to standard though, unless the whoever stipulated we get another 20 year lease compensates us big time for breaking that contract.

Does anyone know why the main stand has been take down at the Boulevard?

You really are a sad and lonely person who tries to get rid of your personal anguish by pretending to be who you are not.Walter Mitty was like that and he was a buffoon.If you are ashamed of being a dobbin maybe you could have shock therapy at Morrill Street clinic.Envy manifests itself in some very peculiar ways.Ever thought of applying to the dobbins for a job on the "board"

In what way?

The HJ offers good facililities alround with a choice of standing or seating.

Im hoping KC does get expanded as it will mean more cash for City and also the atmosphere against the likes of Man Utd, Liverpool, Chelsea etc would be awesome with a full 35k

But on the other hand at FC games the atmosphere would be like Huddersfield and watching the games and looking around and theres 20,000+ empty seats wont be good but still id rather watch the game in a 35,000 state of the art stadium than go back to a 12,000 dump

Radford must have took a bang to the head tho to come out and say he would like to go back to Boulevard

You see more conspiracies than Fox Mulder. Not related to Damo from the Leeds Board are you? Actually, you're probably not - his nonsense is far more entertaining.

You lot are priceless, you've harped on for years about how your a superior team playing in a superior stadium and how far behind the red n whites are with no chance of us ever catching up, well we've caught up and overtaken on the playing front, now it looks like in the not too distant future we'll have the superior stadium too!!!
the best thing about your club is that we don't have to struggle to catch up with you cause your board are doing a great job of dragging you backwards whilst we continue to move forwards, and i agree that Radford would not have said this sort of thing without some sort of media screening by the club, it looks to me that this is one of the clubs famous 'surveys' that they carry out just to get the feel of what the fans think about it when they actually do it!
I say well done Tool and Hitlerington for doing such a great job of making HKR the best team in the city.

I agree with this.

2. Member Conduct

2.1. Comments that are wholly designed to upset or cause distress to other members are prohibited on this site.



Please ban him.

I think it's time trolly cash went.

What he said.

if that comment is aimed at me why?, i have spoken via pm to PaulM, who i have to say is a nice guy and a good Moderator, as long as i abide by the rules i am fine,i am simply expressing my opinion regarding the remark Radders made about returning to the Bouevard, i havent done anything wrong or broken any A.U.P rule , i feel my post was very constructive, i am not doing it to upset anyone the Hull Daily Mail ran the story as did Radio Humberside last night, i am merely commenting on a club related issue that is in the media spotlight , how is that wrong ? , i know radders comments will ruffle feathers and there will be fans that do not want to return to the Boulevard , however there may be fans that would like to return there, why Radders made that comment who knows , i have expressed why i think he did , i for one think the board should comment on Radders remarks, he made them to the local newspaper which of course is going to get people speculating , so i feel it would be apt of the board to be straight with us .

Johnny

Why should the board comment?

It's trolls like you that turn one off comments into stories.

I know the AUP doesn't legislate against stupidity, would that it did, blatant trolling would be a good offence to add too.

You are right about Paul though.