rlIndeed - and a tad hypocritical on Brian's partrl
.

The dobbins seem to Be very concerned over this incident

Watched it about 10 times now my opinion is ...it's a bad one tbf but absoloutly no intent what's so ever in my mind , Danny McGuire retaliated with a kick to sneydes head . Both should receive a ban

Reckless from Sneyd but nothing intentional, or that irregular. Still doubt we'll see him for a good few games.

McGuire did kick out yes, but AFTER the roll by Sneyd that has damaged his ankle and clearly left him in pain.

Before the roll all McGuire is trying to do is stand up and has his right foot in place for the PTB. The only reason Sneyd holds on is to stop him from doing that because you have no defenders back, not because of some alledged fear of getting a kick if he lets go.

Sneyd could've stayed laying on his stomach whilst holding the ankle, that's fine. Sure he'd have conceded the penalty and probably 10 mins anyway but nothing dangerous about it. But he doesn't stayed on his stomach, he decides to roll himself over completely unnecessarily. He still could've achieved the aim of not allowing him to PTB by staying layed on his stomach whilst holding the ankle.

Don't be coming out with that sort of stuff

Quote: Mrs Barista "It was no1 on McDermott's list of priorities post match to cite Sneyd's tackle as deliberately intended to injure, so yeah, I guess it's up there.'" actually it wasn't. a closer view. https://vine.co/v/eiYLYxADzHj

Quote: Mrs Barista "It was no1 on McDermott's list of priorities post match to cite Sneyd's tackle as deliberately intended to injure, so yeah, I guess it's up there.'" actually it wasn't. a closer view. https://vine.co/v/eiYLYxADzHj

8 to 12 matches for a charge which even if they applied the highest grade is only 3 to 5.

Nice work Gteshull

So did mcguires injury occur before he kicked out at Sneyd or after?

Seeing it on ssn highlights would seem the latter, no way would mcguire kick out at Sneyd if Sneyd had broken his ankle during the tackle as mcguire would be in severe pain

Is it? McDermott is giving his opinion immediately after a match his team have played in and had his player injured.

Wane had a go calling for McGuire to be banned for an incident in a Leeds/Catalans game so Wane had no involvement in that game and had Catalans knocked us out of the playoffs then Wane wouldn't have said anything about McGuire to try get him banned.

He only did so because we were facing Wigan the next weekend. I know we're facing you lot again on Friday but I think McDermott's interview would've been exactly the same even if we weren't meeting again this week.

Let me see...

Two coaches calling for players to banned just ahead of games against the teams those players play for.

Nah. Clearly no similarities there whatsoever.

And FWIW...

Having looked at the incident a few times there's no doubt in my mind that there was no intent to injure. However, I'd definitely call it reckless which will mean he picks up a ban of some sort.

Sneyd lets go when McGuire kicks him so are you of the belief that an ankle can break/injure simply by someone letting go of it?

That he's in pain is exactly why he'd kick out. If you had a broken hand and someone tried squeezing it would you not try hitting them off you with your other hand?

Didn't realise you were kirk yeaman.
Sorry Kirk the next time you make more than two metres from a scoot ill definitely mention it on here.

I would have thought the obvious response to someone twisting your left leg would be to kick with your right to get them off.

Dab