Looks like we will have a decent 17

Lovodua for JJ
Satae for Laidlaw
I'd have Wynne for Barron or Simm too.

I hope they're not famous last words

Hudds don't seem to have it that bad players missing wise.

Tough game and our record at Hudds isn't great

No we are doing ok managed to name 20 this week
Have our first choice right side pairing, our other centre, our best prop, best bench player unavailable through injury and our half is serving a one match ban- but other than that good to go!

Satae for Laidlaw
Lovudua for JJ
Wynne for Barron
the three changes for the bench for me keep the rest the same.

I wasnt asking you to give us wardle - he's not been our first choice - which is why he went to warrington cause he was crying he wasnt playing! I meant leroy who partners jerry but I've just noticed leroy has been named this week - double bonus!!! so I will take that one back

lolohea for russell shouldnt be a replacement, our first choice squad would have them both on the field, russell in the halves tui at FB.

I can't be bothered to get into a pishing competition about who's got the most disrupted squad. But it's not Huddersfield.

I'd hardly call Huddersfield an injury hit squad as other than McGillivray, Hill and Leutele and possibly Cogger I don't see them being too badly off when it comes to selecting a squad for the game. Ok Russell is suspended but even then they still have majority of a first 17 available as opposed to us with well over half our regular 17 sat in the stands through injury then one on suspension.

The fact we can only name a 20 man squad (1 more than last week, and 2 more than the week before) is more about the disruption than who’s missing. It affects preparation.

Hows your academy going that played a big part in Watson going to Huddersfield for?

Just admit you haven't got it that bad compared to other teams

Toulouse look to have Rovers rattled. Still fancy them to rally in the second half, but it's making an interesting game