Quote: Armavinit "IF Connor had played no one can say what would have happened. He’s the team’s talisman, taking the onus of creation from the dire halfbacks, we have. Why is it that everything you say is correct and anyone who has a different view is wrong. Indiscipline on the pitch really isn’t Hodgson’s fault, it’s the bloody stupid players who are guilty of bloody stupid indiscipline. He’s not dumb, it’s the bloody stupid players. I made my view on this thread and predicted our slow slide down the league because we’ve pinned everything on Connor. Reynolds and Gale are passengers, Shaull’s past it but you wanted him in the team, he’s past it but you slated Yeamo when he was in the same position. Rant over, Uber.'"
If you are going to have a rant then please get your facts correct
1) Even Hodgson said after this game Connor would have made no difference
2) Hodgson is the coach of the club and responsible for all team matters and that includes discipline on and off the pitch..Indiscipline has been a serious matter for months yet nothing has been done.All he says is its something we talk about.If the players arnt doing what he asks then drop them
3) Shaul did little wrong yesterday and i agree he is past his best but it was a better decision in my opinion and obviously the coach agreed to play Shaul at full back rather than move players around yet you criticise me for wanting him in the team.
4) Shaul is standing in for an injured player.Yeaman was cemented in the team and stole a living from the club.big difference
