Why does he need your back up.

He doesn't but that was what i saw as well. As for Tansey being a Lover i shall refrain from comment

hehehehe

lauaki is poor IMO. We've seen the odd glimpse but far too little of it to warrant a quaota spot. My mate calls him ethel, says he plays like an old woman

He was better when he was being a mental case imo. Without that he's just a very average player. Remind you of anyone [size[(Rooney hehe)[/size

Lee Radford is like our Emile Heskey.

He must cost us god knows how penalties a game.

And he looks like running onto the pitch knackers him out

He was never a mental case though, people base that on the game against Rovers alone.

Give over,Radford could never be as bad as that.

Aye, was someone behind us who was saying how great Childs was in the first half, we seemed to get everything

Dont suppose Nathan Brown went to see him at half time to remind him who the home team was do you

Sounded like the pens made all the difference and you can't play without the ball, momentum is huge now in SL.

While that did play a massive part i also thought our kicking game was shocking and didn't build any pressure through it. Pretty much every kick in the second half was a bomb to Brett Hodgson regardless of field position, we should have just been putting it on the floor behind Lolesi who is a 2nd rower playing on the wing instead of bombs to the safest fullback in the league.

Also the whole Tickle moving to the left when Hame comes on is a crazy tactic that messes up our entire structure.