Just realised there were 10 possible disciplinaries for this game!!!

Agreed that Long will be made example of. just a shame that the both sets of players felt they had to take matters into their own hands due to the ineptitude of the official.

8 Have been ruled "No further action" and supported with a variety of reasons ranging from the slightly odd to very very bizzare.

just read on skysports.com that long faces a 5 match ban grade D intentional striking!

You could also have read it on the Child thread or the Long thread.

i thought it would be up somewhere but didnt have time to check i was in such a rage ha

With him never being sent off in his career before and the circumstances leading to the incident you would expect a bit of leniency.

I hope not, we will do better without the waste of space in the side.

Bit harsh, all things considered. Had his best game of the year on Friday.

Absolutely no chance of leniency. I fully expect the full 5 game ban as indirect punishment for making a formal complaint.

Agreed. The only upside of Long being out is that we get more gametime from Obst, unless Agar goes with Washy and Horne in the halves with Obst rotating Houghton.

Maybe so, I cannot really comment because I was not there. But if true then why did we still only score 3 tries, 2 of which were barge overs.

no, it's true, that's how gash he has been in other games!!!

Never said he was good, just that it was his best so far.

For what he did he deserves no leniency.