Id sooner have kept Hall.....Turner offers us nothing...he is another Graeme Horne.

attacking wise hall was better,but defensively turner is more solid,and scored tries when the opportunity arose.

Hall scored tries when opportunity arose and created his own as well......Depends what you want from your centre really.

Completley disagree.
I think Turner has the potential to be a great centre. The moment it clicked for me was when he scored a try this year at Leeds in April and I remember thinking what a great 'centres' try it was, ran a strong angle and with pace to finish.

A strong running defender.

In my opinion, Hall was neither of these.

Turner is a good defender and I believe his running will get better with time.

I'm not convinced by that TBH. His positional sense is very weak in the centres IMO. He may yet improve that, but at this moment in time I'm leaning more towards Baldy than yourself and Tommy. He'd be 5th choice in the centres next season if it was up to me.

there is nothing on here that is anything other than in someone's opinion.

Not quite. I can think of a few that clearly don't have their own opinion, and just jump on the latest bandwagon.

ah, good point!

Thank you, I copied it off another thread.

Have a look at the two Leeds games over the two weeks and then tell me Turner can defend. He flaps at players and doesn't look to have the confidence or aggression needed. Long way to go and he looks to have dropped down the pecking order anyway for next year.

rlUnfortold joy, Whiting fancies himself as a centrerl

Posted yesterday or day before I think.

was put on wednesday

Actually, if you read the article, it suggests that Agar has told Whiting that [ihe[/i sees him as a centre. It seems only natural then that he should wish to establish himself as a first choice in the position his coach intends to play him.