alot better then tansey imo tansey was to off the cuff the players didnt even no wat he was goin to do half the time but yer he did spoil himself and in my opinion were wasting alot of money on mckinnon when we have what we need

Tansey stood out in a dire , predictable , one dimensional team .

I haven't read all of this thread, cba with readin 14 pages, but at the moment I would rather stick with Phelps. He puts in a lot of effort and is improving with every week as he gets back into the swing of things. He also has age on his side and I would wager that he would be on a lower salary than MacKinnon would be.

Agreed.

a good solid fullback....tough as teak. won't rip up superleague but won't make many mistakes either. I like this signing a lot.

Horne imo is hitting some form, dont understand your big downer against him

Phelps is younger than McKinnon but that's it. In every other aspect Wade is the better player.

Phelps is also far cheaper, younger, less 'busted' and therefore nowhere near as big a risk!

How motivated is Phelps going to be for the rest of the season? Could we keep him as well?

The man who got us to Wembley on one leg you mean?

As for 99% of people having to google him, who'd heard of Colin Best before we'd signed him?

In fact, Cameron Phelps was released by the Bulldogs early so they could sign Nick Youngquest he played 4 games for them and has since played for Gateshead, Crusaders and Castleford.

Things need putting into perspective Phelps is average but playing well.

again another person who just likes being negative. Dykes was good for us with 1 leg. Just a shame some people didnt see it. Also its a shame he wasnt fit coz he could have tore it up here

Think he'll make way, tbh - no point using up a quota and a non-fed spot on a squad player (even with the availability of top antipodeans seemingly set to drop). Should still be motivated though - could get a deal at Widnes, Crusaders etc, so he'll want to impress.