We need a quality 6 and 7, especially when the quality 7 is missing, its been doing the rounds on here for years,

Are you drunk ? Are you saying that Brian Smith didn't turn an absolute average team into the best in the League within 18 months ??
Great managers turn average to good , good to great and great to pheanominal !!!!! If you think Des Hasler was in charge of Hull last season would we have finished bottom ? Or even if Morgan was in charge ?
Agar showed his true colours last season I am afraid.
If you don't think coaches make a difference then why sack Sharp ? Why get rid of Bomber (what has he done since ?)
If we listen to you then we might as well get Steve Crooks in charge

I've always been a fan of Rich Whiting, but it sounds like he had a mare today. With the competition for places its up to the players to keep their shirts, and on the back of today I think its only fair Turner gets a shot at centre next week.

but whiting has had service but just dosent have quality in attack . whiting deserved to play becasue his performances have been good but we need more speed and quality in that position turner or hall for me.

Guess you don't really understand the game then do you?

Yak never has and never will be an impact player. He does 'his' job really well he's a good solid player.
Whiting has no class in attack? Seemed to do pretty well last week in putting Hally away down the wing.

That was my thoughts. If Calderwood is fit, then Hall to centre.

Horne and Washy don't work, that is why I was not shocked.
Getting down the field has hardly ever been a problem, but getting organised and over the line has.

I would (if Long is out) go for Turner & Tansey, with Whiting at FB.
If Tickle is still out then Fitzy to second row, and Washy to LF

Whiting has played great in the last two games - when we had a halfback in the side. He might have not done as well today, but then, who did? To scapegoat Whiting on the basis of one poor team peformance is stupid.

Bags of opinions from fans on who to play where ?
Where are the posts that say

" Leave it to Rich , he knows best , never seen us wrong "

Proves that as soon as we lose our only quality half back, we go back to s h i t.

exactly cusack does his job and is a solid workhorse but weve got that in dowes, radders and fitzy so why another one. we dont need 4 workhorses, the balance in the pack needs another impact player and thats why we signed moa on a 2 year contract.

Can think of worse phrases then that

Rich Agar is a half back isn't he ? Get him in.

So why drop cusack? Radders has been poor for the last 3 games. I also don't understand all the negative comments about Whiting? He wasn't great but he certainly didn't have a shocker either.

rADFORD PLAYED WELL AT sts....WELL WHAT WE SAW OF IT AND WAS GOOD V hUDDS BEFORE BEING INJURED.........ID BE TEMPTED TO LEAVE THE GOB ON LEGS OUT AS A WAKE UP CALL TO HIM TO KEEP HIS GOB SHUT.

Sorry about caps