Don't worry mate, i am, and i am!!!

I don't think there is much between either teams packs, but i think Rovers have a better set of threequarters and better half backs.


































..Oh and a better full-back

I disagree about the threequarters. They have one better centre, but up until Briscoe's injury the rest were at least equally matched. I agree they have a better SH but we have a better SO in my opinion.

Given the choice of all those that played yesterday i would not take any of Hull's threequarter line. Of Hull halves I would take R Horne as a back substitute and nothing more.

That's up to you of course, but I think you're well wide of the mark.

Fairy muff.

Fox over Calderwood
Welham over G Horne
Webster over Yeaman
Colbon & Briscoe - tough choice TBF (though Colbon was outstanding yesterday)

Dobson over Thorman
Cooke over R Horne - tough call but Cooke is more creative.

I'd say they were even.


I'd have literally [ianyone[/i over G Horne TBH.


Webster might shade it ATM. Yeaman has been better though.


Briscoe every day of the week for me.


No argument there.


Horne is twice the player Cooke is. And for the record, I had the same opinion when they both played for us. Then again, I prefer a creative 7 and running 6 to two creative players with no runner.

Lets just say they are both different types of players. I prefer two creative HB's with plenty of options. With Hulls ordinary middle backs and prop like second rows it wouldn't work having two creative players in the halves. On the other hand a running HB wouldn't work at Rovers, though Dobson is probably capable of palying both roles.

Oh and what about the FB?? Briscoe or Hull's best

my 4 from those would be

fox
webster
yeaman
briscoe

I'd also take balsawood over colborn

You've lost the plot since the derby gekko

No but it seems you have!!!!

Calderwood over Colbon????