I respect everyones opinion, Personally I'd run with Miller and Horne with AH as back up for now unless something crops up from the WC.

Pryce is a no go and I just think Witts best days are also behind him.

That's why I'd only give a year.

Can't believe some people want Michael Witt.

Want? If Holdsworth leaves were a 5/8th short .

Any rumours as to Holdsworth's destination?

I would prefer to take either Witt or Pryce on a 1 year deal than risk taking a relatively unknown / unproven player highlighted at the world cup.

Sure a player may serve up the best 2 or 3 games of his life on the big stage, but then be a total flop for a full season with Hull.

I would be much happier with either of the 2 proven performers mentioned. I would have to say Witt would be my preferred option.

Melbourne was one rumour.

You see that's the problem for me. Neither have proven a great deal over the last 12 months. If Witt could regain the form shown at Crusaders then that's different but it's a big if.

Is there nobody with a year left on contract we could put a decent offer in for?

Haha well I'd rather not have an ex tampon wearing gypsy but if his dodgy defending can be sorted prefer him to pryce or Witt

I have heard a rumour that If Holdsworth does move to Melbourne, We'd be putting in a Transfer Fee for Dobbo..

We were told the half-back recruitment was gonna be pivotal and a priority for the new regime.
It's more of a fooking mess now than previously.

Holdsworth - Wants out and looks like we are resigned to that and are hoping someone might do us a favour and take him off our hands.

Miller - Told he'll be back but the vibe is that he's hardly sprinting down the runway to jump on a flight back for pre-season.

Horne - Old Faithful but will be 32 next year and the injury problems persist.

It's not gonna happen.

That's why i said it was a rumour.. Would be good and funny though.. I've heard someone from Parramatta though