Not a bad player at all.

Hes contracted 2011 with hudds anyway.

Good winger who can cover fb.

contracts mean nothing

yes they do.

If hudds didn't want him to play for anyone else next season he won't.

No they don't, ask carvell

If he wants out, or they want rid then he'll be allowed to leave

If we didn't want carvell to play for wire he wouldn't have.

WE agreed a deal with wire, WE let him sign for them after a suitable argrement had been made.

Back to hodgson, when he signed a four year deal at the start of 2008 sharp said we'd been in discussions but weren't prepered to match hudds offer of 70k a season.

Wonder why we would now? Are we that desperate for wingers?

Nice example. Name another time that has happened....

Otherwise it can be filed as a rare occurence.

I'd snap him up straight if available (which I can't see him being), would be a good signing, better than what we currently have, can cover full back, capable of going the length of the field and the right side of 30.

he's older then calderwood.

I think there's better available but not sure if we could attract them.

paul cooke, adam dykes, paul king, gareth raynor. God knows how many aussies. If a player wants out or a club wants rid it's easy. Happens all the time

Wasn't there a story about us ing him about with negotiations when he was a youngster which meant he ended up at Halifax?

He's no superstar but he knows the way to the tryline and is a specialist winger of which we have one in our squad who is injured and himself OOC at the end of the season.

but both parties have to agree or the club has to pay them out in full.

True, we could have let almost 10% of our salary cap sit in the stands but it's not a great idea is it?

True, and it happens regularly

The story goes we didn't turn up for the meeting.

Wheres Calderwood? is it true he's left us?