It does make you wonder how much input both financially and in terms of planning that the Rovers board have had/able to have. They knew in December it wasn't going to be ready,they prepared everyone for it by saying at the fans forum that if the worst came to the worst it'd be ready for next season and didn't seem to highlight any issues in their part should that be the case.
The swipe at Hull is just so predictable,he can't help himself. They've had enough handouts and help over the years and only pay a peppercorn rent themselves for Craven Park. It's gonna get messy is this.

they are usually first things to consider , in fact its a legal requirement to have one every 60m or something like that and you have to consider the right amount for number of people attending and mix of males/females

I honestly originally felt a bit sorry for Rovers, especially as Phil Webbo helped us out (in addition to his assistance to HKR) on the picturegate issue but then Hudge had to spoil it by having a pop at us when its totally unrelated.

Do we know how much they pay rent for Caravan park ? It sounds like the council has assisted both clubs but he is like a kid arguing that one member of the family has got better Christmas presents than him.

Hudge said we don't get it free we pay £60,000 a year for the hire of 2600 seat 13 times.

Cost - £60,000
Profit - 2600 x £20 x 13 = £676,000

Hmmm seems like a pretty good deal to me, also I now wonder exactly how much KR contibuted for the stand because it seems not alot from that article.

what a set of filthy beggars they are.

Never was that phrase more apt.

Hudgell can't help himself can he? But when you devorce yourself from the petty one up man ship and look at the bigger picture as Pearson always says a strong Rovers is good income wise for us although it pains me to say it.
(Thats just me talking economics and nothing else )

However if they were expecting a £500,000 advance from the caterers in this years income projections, Mr Allam (sorry the good Doctor Allam) stated last Friday that the £1m was only a loan and they were now paying it back, coupled with falling gates, falling secondary spend, a regular loss of around £500,000, the loss now apparently likely on projected income from seats in the new stand etc. you can see why the Rovers Directors reviewed their positions before carrying on this year can't you? It looks like Timeshare Tony at any cost to me.

As Hutchie says Don't you walk out one morning and say "Doh!!! that first panels blue and hey guys where's the turnsiles" Strange!