I'm not sure how fit he is, that might be why he played academy, perhaps the coaching staff aren't either. Regardless, after a bruising encounter with Bradford I did say during the week that I would personally have preferred Moa not to play against Cas, even if that meant another backrower on the bench (Washbrook was definitely fit wasn't he?) and Radford's 2nd stint being at prop.

Be interesting to know what he's getting paid, and how much he costs per minute doing 15 minutes a game!

Can't really say I'd be bothered about that personally. He'd actually come out as better value than Tony, Raynor, Whiting, and Washbrook so far this season, would you say those are bad investments?

He's not fit and arguably shouldn't be in the team, that he is is down to the coaching staff and it's not fair to start suggesting he's being overpaid beacuse of it IMO.

Its also already been stated he is on a very low wage as a project, to date im happy with him as an investment. He wouldnt be in the first 17 if King wasnt injured or if Crocker/lauaki were here.

Wigan do with Palestine (easier to spell) but granted that is the exception and not the rule.

You're right, it would be, which is why I haven't.

It was intimated in your post though, otherwise why would you care how much he was earning in comparison to his game time?

Had he not had a game yet, would you find it interesting how much he was paid?

I'm always interested to know what we are expending on players, yes.

Fair enough. I don't really care too much providing they warrant their place in the squad.

I can see both points of view, it's like the whole Crocker situation, I assume we are paying him whilst he awaits his visa, will that count on the cap even if he doesn't come over and play etc.etc.