challenging?bottom of the league .ha ha

You are seriously deluding yourself. But you keep on dreaming if it keeps you happy.

I’m a Warrington fan I don’t care, just speaking the truth . Only thing stopping hull fc from getting up there challenging is a decent coach, there’s plenty stopping hull k.r, poorer players, 3 stands in an awful stadium, fewer supporters, this is just from an outsiders perspective. Hull fc are a big club, rovers unfortunately aren’t.

Well thanks for your outside perspective......Im sure the players and fans of Hull Kingston Rovers wont lose any sleep over your opinion of us

I dont understand Buchanan been included at all.
He drafts Cam Scott into the 21 who is staying at the club then plays Buchanan ahead of him when he is leaving the club.
We are desperately short of forwards yet Bienek never gets a look in.
Maybe something to do with having to take on his salary if Leigh release him but then why have Scott released when we have plenty of centre/wing cover and then dont play him.
Seems to me Last is way out of his depth here and as you say why all the positional changes when Shaul went off

Scott was signed before the financial meltdown, Buchanan was released because of the financial meltdown - maybe the club believes Buchanan is currently still the better player of the two.
Or maybe we shouldn't consider playing anyone who's contract hasn't yet been renewed - it's still a long list!!

Maybe Bienek hasn't a release clause with Leigh, and they want to keep him?
Maybe Leigh released Scott?

Lot's of maybe's, but a good excuse to criticise the club, that's all you're looking for.

Why would Leigh want to keep Bienek and pay him when he is not playing?
Why would the club get a release for Scott and presumably take on his salary again,include him in the 21 then not play him?
Why when we are so short of forwards did the club not get a release for Bienek rather than Scott whose wing/centre position is well covered.
I understand some of your points but they dont make sense.
What it looks like is that Bienek has no future at the club and will be released

You keep saying "why", but ignore any plausible reasons.

Bienek won't have cost Leigh a penny if I understand the furlough payments correctly.
They could be paying 10% from 1st September.

How do you know what the loan agreements are?
Some have release clauses, some don't.
Some require both clubs to agree on a release.

I know no more than you do, so I don't criticise the club - you take the opposite approach.

Ignoring some of the irrelevant and inflammatory posts, as I've only just been able to watch the match tonight, yesterday's performance felt like a real kick in the teeth again.
From the highs of Huddersfield back to the lows of Salford.
A performance littered with errors, a static attacking structure yet again that you could throw a net over and only relying on the individual brilliance of Kelly.
Defensively once more extremely soft conceding some easy tries.
Due to our poor attacking structure, errors, coupled with Warringington's aggressive defence and enthusiasm, we tackled ourselves to a standstill and ran out of energy.
We are a team of good individual players but not a good team.
I'd hoped Last and the team had turned a corner last week but it was another performance in which we flatter to deceive.
There is no change in our play or attitude and it's very disappointing to watch.

Lol. You got Wire sussed there.
It’s a good job you could blame Radders last time.

Bearing in mind our creativity is leaving at the end of the season, we’d better find an attacking structure sooner rather than later.

Kelly would be sensational in a team like Saints.

i would look good in the saints team

Anyone got the stats for the times we got done for the six again rule, perhaps it was our fault, but it seemed to be all that was happening.