Wrong player at the wrong time.
We were after Luke Walsh a the same time as him and I was pleased when we signed Miller instead, as I thought he was the more exciting player.
Too much was expected of him.
If he was taking less cap space up, I'd like us to keep him to be honest.

Let's hope there aren't too many young FC supporters reading this garbage.
Odd how most posts like this come from individuals who live hundreds of miles from the club, and rarely attend any matches.

As I said earlier where is your proof he is either of those things.

Jury still out for me.

Most of this board was screaming banging their hands of ham demanding a mega name expensive coach, then we get Radders and suddenly the hands of ham get lifted in jubilation

24 games.

He was given a 3 year deal to do settle and learn the club and the level

IMO 24 games with a different partner at HB every time is not enough

You think it would be acceptable to still be "settling and learning" in a second, never mind a third year?

He was given a optimistic contract like Arundel and Crookes none of which have paid off.

For a 21 year old yes,

Remember people calling for Westerman to be sacked and publicly flogged 14 months ago, he's took time, now we should build a side around him at 13 like we should have 3 years back. He will be our Farrell

As for 24 games in 2 years, that says it all, not given enough chances or a steady partner

News to me.

re-read my other posts which outline them in detail..I'm not repeating it for the likes of you when you can't be bothered to read and/or understand.
HTH

So, why aren't we paying off the real problem within our club? He's had his chance, he's proven he cannot cut the mustard at this level (sorry that should be any level) and just isn't good enough. He has never proven any form or talent yet keeps his position...
Yet it's Miller whom is being treated disgracefully...amongst quite a few other players..CAN NONE OF YOU SEE THE PATTERN HERE FFS!

Lied - Didn't Radford say at the beginning of the season he `would walk if he couldn't do the job'
he clearly couldn't, & he hasn't. - Isn't that lying?

Deceived - Claiming to be a head coach!

Game, set & match.

Hahaha..yup, your response exactly catergorizes you in the 'likes of me' perfectly.
And no..I disgaree, we should have binned Radford off BEFORE he had even 1 game under his belt, he should have manned the up and said I'm not ready, I'm not qualified or expereinced enough to do this job. BUT at the very least we should have binned him during the season when it was plainly obvious he was so far out of his depth..the man is incapable in every capacity and he said he would go if he couldn't cut it..which he can't..so we have a manthat lies and goes back on his word at the helm..
As for my words..I gave details about the issues..something the likes of you won't or just can't..HTH

I suppose the counter-argument to that is that it only takes 24 games to establish that Miller is not up to the job but 30 games is not enough to make the same decision about Radford?