It's harsh to call him greedy and to state he wanted all the glory for himself, he is not that kind of player. I genuinely believe he isn't skillful enough for when in that position to do the right thing

Dim as a Toc H lamp mate.

There is simply no comparison between RLFans - or any other moderated forum - and Twitter. Anything goes on there and even being very selective with who you follow - as I am - you can't fail to notice the amount of pure venom that gets posted.

My point about relevance is that Twitter is different for every single person who uses it. For instance, I haven't seen anyone in my timeline calling for Yeaman to be dropped. Plenty defending him to the hilt though. Similarly nobody can realistically comment on what you may or may not have heard at the game unless they were sat next to you. So bringing those to sources in to support an argument adds little. IMO.

Is it really necessary to have a 16 page thread about one man's misjudgement. It didn't affect the outcome of the game and I'm sure he'll be more alert the next time a similar situation arises. Give the guy a break!!!

Unreal isn't it.
I said get real on page 9.! It's now page 16 that's utterly utterly mad!

I didn't realise there was a page limit for certain topics. Lots of people wanted to discuss his brain fart and his form in general, hence the number of pages!

Hull fans love a good moan, this is 17 pages, while Chris Green's new contract is 2 pages, which is more important for the club?

I watched the game again yesterday, I would suggest others do, Yeaman had a good game, his defence was outstanding, often rushing out and taking the man down on his own, did it to Watkins a few times, Watkins (Great player) stepped him once, too big a gap between him and DJ, but he still got back to help Ellis complete the tackle on him.

Also made lots of metres driving forward out of defence, unlucky in the first half with his try, great break in the 2nd half, massive error not to pass.

Lets be honest had he passed, they would have been a thread praising him, rather than criticising him, bet it wouldn't have been 17 pages though.

He is way ahead of Arundel, look at the last time we played Leeds, Arundel had a nightmare and would have worried if he was lining up against Watkins, he has potential, but lets not get carried away with a couple of half decent performances against Cas and Salford.

It may be 17 pages but if you narrowed it down to posts based on topics it would be 2 - 3 pages at least.

Am I missing something? What is all this talk about Yeaman covering Briscoe's defensive duties all night?