I couldn't find any references to westerman [inot[/i playing in the kells game when we first signed him.

I've looked again, and all I see is his name on the official team sheet.

No mention one way or the other in the match summaries.

He wasn't picked for the following game, but no detail at all.

RFL..... "A player who plays for a Club in the cup cannot, in the same Season, play for another Club in the Cup."

I hope Radford doesnt play Connor and Tuimavave in the halves meaning we have a makeshift centre to find.
Ideal game to play Miloudi at half back so we dont have to move Tuimavave from left centre.
If it works then we can carry Miloudi/Connor into the HKR and Warrington games without moving other players around.
The other option is to play Westerman with Connor which is what i think Radford will do.

So its clear then that Westy can play for us in the cup as its doesn't state 'A player on the team sheet' but 'A player who plays'

He's said he's playing Carlos and Connor in his press conference wonder if Logan will be brought in

Like you said, perfect time for Hakim to show us what he can do. Hope he gets the nod but not looking likely.

If carlos stepping in the halfs maybe Miloudi to centre ??

cant see the point moving players around when this guy is already playing half back for Doncaster.
I thought Logan was injured so if you move Tuimavave into the halves we have to find a makeshift centre.
With kelly out for another three weeks and Sneyd four weeks minimum we need a half back partnership without moving too many players around thats why playing Miloudi at half back against Featherstone for me makes sense and would give the coach an idea whether he could carry the Miloudi/Connor half back partnership into the HKR and Warrington games.
No point naming him in the squad if he isnt going to play.
As i said before we can always play Westerman in the Halfs.

Miloudi not playing in the halves would be a mistake for a fair few reasons as mentioned above, I don't want Westerman and certainly not Washbrook playing there, it'll snuff out our fitness and speed advantage and end up being a crash bang wallop affair which we don't want given our injury situation.
Miloudi and Connor all day long and this means we can rest one or two forwards including Houghton.

As for the Westerman situation, it depends on what the definition of 'played' means, if you are named in the squad to play but don't could that be construed as taken part in the event, this is a problem with the RFL, their defintion's have always being somewhat subjective/open to interpretation at times and undermines their legal position when it comes to certain aspects, you only need look at the whole Wigan salary cap debacle.

I'm sure there'll be a snivelling snitch emailing the RFL to appeal that it shouldn't be allowed.

He was on the team sheet - that always used to be classed as selected to play, even if a non-playing sub. I hope the club have done due diligence on this. I would hate to be expelled from the cup - that's now the penalty.

Miloudi and Connor definitely sounds the way to go. Let Miloudi take over from what Kelly does in terms of providing a ball playing threat but also a big running threat.
Hoping Radder's comments about Carlos in the halves are just to keep Fev guessing.

Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520

Bit of a funny one this..only three subs named on the Toronto bench...no Westerman www.skysports.com/rugby-league/k ... onto/49520

Doh! Never noticed that