Thing is, they don't apply the rules consistently. I could take it if, when we see a similar tackle taking place, we see the same decision being made.
We all know though that we'll see a carbon copy tackle next week involving a different team and they'll just award a penalty.

Thought the Dobbins got away with plenty yesterday, but listening to Phil Clarke, Hull got all the decisions. Never heard from him for the last 15 minutes though . Must have been sat in a corner sulking.

Yeh John Wells put Clark right at the end when he was so P*ssed off with him downing us all the time that he said something like , "Right Phil lets give credit where credit is due"

Clarke was willing Rovers on to win. Wells was pretty fair I thought.

Yeah, I normally quite like Wells and get a little wound up by Clarke.

But yesterday, I wanted to sup on Wells’ tears so badly. From a Rovers POV, his cheerleading for you was close to nauseating. His excitement at Talanoa lifting his fingers off the touchline before grounding the ball (once you’ve touched the line, the play is dead Jon - and this lot still can’t be bothered to spell your name correctly, despite your desperate attempts ingratiate yourself. So there.)

I thought you weren't that bothered about it.

Last year decisions had been published by early afternoon.

Nothing yet - so maybe they've decided that banning players during a 2 day turnover of games was not such a good idea.

Don't think it's a sending off as I said on the match thread but if players were to bend their backs a bit more when making tackles this would rarely ever be an issue.

Spoke too soon, they did meet.

Bureta Faraimo (Hull FC) - Grade B High tackle - 1 Match Penalty Notice

(whatever that might mean.)

Grasping at straws but does he have an EGP or is that even a thing now?

Watts got a "3 match penalty notice", so I guess he's out of the game on Monday.

Would rather he serve it against Wakey than Saints tbh, so better than expected.

Don't think so. 1 is the lower end of grade B in any case. There is the opportunity for an appeal but that carries risks as well as possible reward.

Everyone seems to have an opinion on this one I spoke to a rovers fan this morning who said it was never a red card, I believe it was, it was clumsy and a poor technique the arm was coming around but after the fact, he also seemed to change his angle of attack just before leaving the ground and went in at a higher angle, which made it look far worse than it would of otherwise. I would love refs to be consistent but we also need to consistent in our expectations, if we cant decide whats a red and whats not we are never going to be happy with the referees decision. There was no intent to cause harm IMO but it could easily have done as much damage as the one he was on the receiving end of against Warrington if he had him a few inches higher.