Rather have Carney but would be pleased with him. Although HDM doesn't have a great track record on potential signings.

If he signs I'd for a back line of;

Jones-Bishop.
Logan..
Fonua.
Talanoa.

Not that back but I don't think it's good enough for the top 6 but the forwards certainly are.

I'd certainly agree with that. Lancaster & Logan certainly have the potential to be though and it would be nice if we recruited better on the other side to ease the pressure on them.

If we cant make the top 6 with this squad that's been assembled, we may as well give up. On paper we should be challenging top 4 imo

We haven't got the back line to challenge top 4.

Chase now been banded about. Leigh couldn't secure him and apparently were in talks. I don't know what to think. He goes missing some games and his discipline isn't great. But he wins some games single handed. If they were concerned about squad unrest with Carney, I'm not sure signing Chase would be the best option. IMO our back up hooker will be Washbrook.

Would be a reasonable signing,but I've never been sat watching a game thinking 'Christ don't let them get the ball out wide to BJB' like I did with carney...

In talks with Chase on a two year deal according to latest Transfer Rumour on The Rugby League Fan Page on FB.

I'd be shocked if Pearson is even entertaining the idea of Chase.

lots of names being banded about and looks as though pearson trying hard to get in good players, am exited about next year already

The problem with Chase is weighing-up the pros and cons. He offers world class attack some of the time, but comes with a bad attitude and you can forget developing a HB partnership, as it's all about him.

Personally, I'm not a gambler. The question is, is Pearson?

apart for Ben Jones Bishop whoelse has been linked to us ?

Never liked chase, inconsistent and a bad attitude.

my rovers mate told me that we were about to bid for Kelly