Like this one by Sinfield on Westerman....

This weekends charges are .....

Leeds Rhinos forward Carl Ablett has been charged by the Rugby Football League for allegedly kicking Warrington winger Joel Monaghan during the game at The Halliwell Jones Stadium on May 30.

An allegation that Zak Hardaker of Leeds Rhinos made homophobic comments during the same game has also been referred to the RFL Compliance Department, which has begun a formal investigation.

Hull KR player Michael Weyman has also been charged with using foul and abusive language towards a match official during the 54-12 defeat at Castleford on June 1.

The RFL have charged Wakefield's Richard Moore with a Grade B striking offence in the match against Bradford on June 1, and during the same match Bradford player Elliot Kear, who submitted an early guilty plea, has been charged with a Grade A striking offence.

The RFL Match Review Panel deemed the sending off of London Broncos player Scott Moore to be sufficient following his high tackle on Hull FC player Callum Lancaster .

Ablett and Moore have until 11.00am on Tuesday to submitt Early Guilty Pleas but Weyman does not have the option of submitting an EGP and will appear before an independent disciplinary tribunal on Tuesday evening.

The RFL Match Review Panel also issued cautions to Matt Diskin (Bradford Bulls) and Eloi Pelissier (Catalan Dragons).

I look forward to the hardacker outcome

if found guilty he should never play again

Life ban is a bit OTT standee but I know were your coming from , should cop a big ban tho . I can't see how he can get away with it but this is the rfl after all

And Leeds as well of course!

The "sending off sufficient" decision for Scott More is yet further evidence of the inconsistent performance of the RFL judiciary.

I would love to hear some form of explanation as to why, just two weeks ago a player received a further suspension for a head high shot, yet this week a player gets "sending off sufficient" for an equally dangerous and aggressive play.

Could it be their respective previous (in Crookes case very recent) disciplinary records?

Not sure, but interestingly Neil Hudgell has tweeted this little gem tonight. "I must have fallen asleep in class. Can't recall when match review panel had power to deem a sending off as sufficient?"

hardaker should be made to apologise to child whilst they shower together

In the same game I can't believe Ratchford has got away with the putting excessive pressure on Abletts spine/neck area. He could of caused some serious injury to him.

he's showing his in depth knowledge of the game there

If he is guilty, Hardaker should be sacked from Leeds without question. No need for that.

Can someone help me here I'm interested in that one surely its the disciplinary committee that decides sending off sufficient not the review pane whose job is I thought to identify that a foul was committed, they have identified that it had, but passed judgement themselves when they should surely have passed it onto the disciplinary panel to decide the sentence? Unless the referee has got it really wrong if they are sent off surely they have at least to appear. Have I got that wrong?

If you have, that makes two of us, because that is my take on it also.