You're a ing idiot, take your ing contest elsewhere so adults can chat.

I'm reading the HDM article and it doesn't seem to add up to me.

I'd like to know why AP thinks he's been harshly dealt with.

And you guys signed Reardon leading upto a women against violence demonstration at the KC!

Crookes behaviour was that of a pathetic cowardly scumbag, I understand how men can get into it with each other but hit and assault a young lass, terrible! I'm glad to see many on here and would be happy to see him gone, shame Pearson doesn't believe that to, dealt with harshly? You must be joking AP!

Another idiot.

We don't know the full facts from that article, but a 12 month conditional discharge and compensation is not harsh for assault

Not at all. The guy is a coward. Personally I would also sack him. Plenty of well behaved players deserve a chance in front of crookes. Nextvseason id play shaul on the wing. Do I think he is more a thug then cooke and cockayne? No I dont. Only one misdemeanour. Whereas the two have multiple. What you think des?

Quite, if she suffered a black eye surely that evidence would lead to a bigger sentence?

So if we signed cookie with a string of offences,the offences must have been while he was with you !

Ok Des, this is a warning. If you want to discuss Jason Crookes, fine, if you want to get into a points scoring contest, go back to your board.

I find it unbelievable that adam pearson thinks he has been harshly treated,what do you think ?

No points scoring at all,just replied to a previous post.

A thread to discuss Jason Crookes, fair enough, but to compare it to Travis Burns (which happened on the rugby field) is slightly pathetic & only started to insight a tit for tat battle.

To all the Hull fans responding with the Cooke & Cockayne comments, just leave it, don't lower yourselves to arguing with such a blatant troll.


Anyway, IMO, get rid of the guy. I don't want blokes like that representing Hull. I'm not sure what AP means by saying he was 'harshly dealt with'?

I must confess I am a bit confused and disturbed as to why AP thinks Crookes has been harshly treated. All sounds a bit shady with Radders sending 25 text messages to the father!!

Crookes should be sacked simple as that for me.

I dont think he has been un fairly treated. Like I said. Fairness would be giving his squad number to someone more deserved. I.e youth player or young championship player

Playing devils advocate.

What would AP get out of sacking Crookes?

We need a winger with Lineham injured, we need on for next season if Briscoe goes.

Should the RFL step in if we did sack him, refusing to let him play for a year? Otherwise we get penalised while an other club can strengthen?