Good record? He played 11 games last year.

Before that? As I said, this could be a reoccurrence of that injury, which, as far as I know, is his only major injury whilst in the NRL?

EDIT: Had ankle injury in 2011, but still played 18 games. Hardly injury prone.

same injury same foot as last year for Ellis

He's an ageing injury prone wreck that we should have never signed.

so why are gleeson,welham and eden missing kr's 1st game,they are not old its just bad luck and you know it.

So you don't think older players are more likely to get injured?

not really no menzies ,peacock,lynch,morley,briers, would lend weight to my theory. all ages get injured, end of.

If you don't think you get injured more with age why do you think players retire in their 30s?
It's a commonly accepted fact that with age comes injuries.

So why don,t warrington get more injuries than everyone else,they have easily the oldest squad and why haven't any of the players i mentioned earlier retired yet

they retire because they lose pace and power not because they are injured

There are exceptions to every rule,picking out older players who haven't retired doesn't prove that players don't retire when they get older any more than Mike Burnett retiring proves that most players retire in their early 20s.
Age brings injuries.

And why do they lose pace and power?

It's Gareth Ellis, he's one of the best backrowers in the world.

Every SL club and the majority of NRL clubs wanted him, his age is a slight gamble.

Just bad luck. Adrian Morley was injured in his first match for Wire and missed three months. Since then, barring his eye problem, he's stayed fit, played many, many games and is still going strong at 35.