I'm not moaning about the hull games, im talking about the majority of the games you watch. The decisions they make are terrible. The Leeds, Wigan semi final was an absolute fares.

Apparently it's all about the speed of the play and whether you win the collision as to whether you get decisions or not.

Indeed. You might even be accused of being homophobic if you do.

The problem is when you go to Saints, Wire, Wigan, Leeds refs will always give 50/50 calls to the home side. Hull were doing the same as Wigan in the tackle but we got penalised for it.

Also the opening two mins show it perfectly, they lose the ball and it's a steal, we lose it and it's a knock on.

A bit paranoid on here. The standard is the same for all teams .Poor.

So your game at cp v st's was a game were you got a fair 50/50 deal on all calls ?

Not paranoid just pointing out the inconsistency in decisions.

If the RFL are not careful, the game will end up like Rugger: Penalty driven results and technical infringements perpetuating games.

Exactly right. The early penalty against us for offside when we'd won the collision against Hock (?) and he'd dropped the ball was a classic. There was no shout by the referee to any Hull player telling them they were offside just the whistle after the ball was dropped. Top 4 refereeing.

Betfair should do a 'first penalty to which side' market. Then again you'd be lucky to get 1.01 on some teams.

Have to agree, that one was an awful call.

after hearing what gwyllum llyod, murdoch and pinkney said to us in the services at heartshead moor regarding the thaler/hudgell incident i would beg to differ! any other sport or job thaler would've and should've been sacked!

How was the ref today in your game , was he poor in 50/50 way or poor in a favourable to leeds way ..?