It matters to a front rower when someone tries to dominate you in the scrum Hock was trying to be clever and LMS wasn't having any of it.
I know you may not like that fact but there it is.

That has nothing to do with it being Gareth Hock BTW.

so you agree then lms started the set to because he wasn't happy with hock. in all honesty it really doesn't matter both teams split from the scrum soon as the ball passes the 2nd rowers feet its hardly as if hock was angling for a better position to push or strike for the ball.

Why try it at all scrums are crap anyway and goes in the 2nd row.

No Hock started it by trying to steal the head.
How many more times do you want me to say it?
Oh wait let me guess I have a agenda against Hock right?

Ask Gareth Hock.

no honestly i dont think you do, i actually think your abit old school and some reason think it actually matters where the heads go these days and it doesn't. lms tried to man handle hock and hock gets a bit angry and rubbed hes head into hes face then words was followed by a few love taps nothing major.

i dont think its anything to do with attempting to dominate at the scrum it really doesn't matter these days.

Rubbish.
Hock knew what he was doing.
You can deny it all you like.

It's the principal of what Hock tried to do, LMS wasn't having any of it. Fair play.

Magennis deserves more than a one game ban, but so do O'Loughlin and Mossop for throwing at Magennis while he's being held, cheap shot merchants. Mossop threw his punch and then ran away the big fairy.

the fact your saying o'loughlin threw a punch shows you haven't seen it at all or not a good view of it, he doesn't throw a punch at all even tho the dog was still trying to windmill at him. and mossop should get into boxing if he flaws him with players holding him.

plus mossop punched him after a punch was thrown hes way even saints fans have admitted it.

Shock horror!! Hock's lover tries to defend thug's actions.

Hock shouldn't even be playing the game, drug addled cheat (playing bloody well up until yesterday mind!)

For me Hock and LMS in the bin, maybe a one match ban, with Tuson's red being correct, and probably 2 games for that, and Magenis getting 4 or 5 games for throwing the first punch in that bit of biff.

I hope that the biff never leaves the game though, surely everyone loves a good scrap?

I have to admit - a good tear up does make good viewing. I know some will say it shouldnt be part of the game and each to his own I suppose.

Personally I enjoy it in the same way I like to watch a good boxing match, as long as it doesnt detract from a decent game, and it didnt.

Hock is a bell end though, he is always looking for it in every game, the only shame for me it someone didnt drop him

Lee Mossop: Rule: 15.1(a) Detail – Punching Grade B MRP - Referred to tribunal (1-2 matches)

Chris Tuson: Rule: 15.1(a) Detail – Punching - Sustained Grade C MRP - Referred to tribunal (2-3 matches)

Gareth Hock: Rule: 15.1(a) Detail – Punching Grade B MRP - Referred to tribunal (1-2 matches)

Shaun Magennis: Rule: 15.1(a) Detail – Punching – Violent/Sustained Grade D MRP - Referred to tribunal (3-5 matches)

Louie McCarthy-Scarsbrook: Player becomes involved in confrontation with opponent but does not throw punches. MRP - NFA