I am not griping about the way we played, I thought it was good. In my opinion a player is either fit or not, that includes the bench. Also in my opinion you should never attempt to play with 16 players. Clearly you should utilise the bench more effectively. I don't understand why I should go to Brantingham to tell lauaki anything. It's just my opinion on an internet forum. Get over yourself.

He speaks really highly of you apparently.

Although Sharp carries an attacking threat, his defence is somewhat lacking. I thought the decision to bring on Whiting late in the game was spot on. The game was won and with Whitings better defence we had a far more solid look. Agar was closing down the game. Whiting may not like the utility player tag but he is such a good utility player and as such the ideal player to have on the bench. I bet all of us breathed a big sigh of relief when Rich replaced Sharp. He must have the safest, most unflappable pair of hands in the game.

My only issue with this is why have a player occupying a bench spot for the sake of it as a 'utility' in a kind of 'just incase' mind set. It could have been used for a further prop or second row to offer a bit more rotation. In hindsight, we didn't really need it last night and I thought all the forwards did well last night and Danny Houghton seems to relish playing 80 mins. However, week after next I imagine Obst will be back on the bench so it won't be an issue.

To be fair he did back up well when players made a break, often the only player to do so.

But it should be his last season with us.

Can you explain that in English

Got them right last night . And got the 2 points.

ah right, never saw that and its first ive heard of it

Thought Horne played well, was involved in a lot of the good stuff.

I disagree, he was poor.

Don't know if it's right, but it might explain why Moa and Lauaki have been brought on with 90 seconds to go in the first half of a couple of games.

If its not a new rule then there is madness at work.

IYO