Your first mistake was to assume that the opinions expressed on an internet message board by <5% of our average home gate reflected the majority opinion of the entire fanbase.

Your second mistake was to protest [iduring[/i the game.

Your third was to aim abuse at anyone who didn't agree with you.

You served only as a distraction to the many people who went to the game to support their team. In fact all you really did was unite the players around Agar even more, and rightly so after your antics.

As has been pointed out, there is a time and place to vent your anger against the board and management.

I hope you know more about rugby than you do of English. But that cannot be too difficult now can it

Regardless of what you know about rugby, to suggest the people running our club know nothing about the game is both ignorant of the facts and shortsighted. Like her or loathe her, Hetherington has been within the fabric of the game for 25 years.

Like everything in life, if you are not prepared to speak out and protest you get what you deserve, if everyone just follows like mindless sheep, nothing will change, Agar will remain in place we will continue to decline, it sumbs up how low we are and how low our expectations are when we are quite pleased we only got beat by 10 off Hudds.

Whether you agree with it or not, at least the board will now start to understand some fans anger, I am sure up until now they thought everything was rosy.

What the board will 'understand' is that half a dozen disgruntled fans made a banner and received no support whatsoever from the majority of the crowd. Hardly likely to fill them with the fear of God, is it?

I'm also pretty sure they know exactly how the fans are feeling. Whether they think they need to do anything about it is another matter.

Sad but true!

Who's pleased?

I'm certainly not pleased about losing 3 competitive games in a row this season (is it now 5 in a row since last year?)

I feel for the poster as he saw everyone spouting off hot air on here and thought quite a few would take banners to Hudds. So they probably thought they would help the cause of getting Agar out. They then turn out and find out actually they are the only ones with the banner and feel a bit peeved off. But to there credit they carry on with what they believe in (whether u agree with them or not) and put the banner out to all to see. Now if players get put off by a banner then they should give up the game tbh as to me seeing the banner should of made them rally around the coach more if they like him as much as they say they do. Either way you look at it the banner got someones attention as it was mentioned in the mail and im sure Rule will now be aware as well as Agar that all is not rosey at fc and the fans are not happy

The banner you bring on Friday should cover the full East Stand.
Sorry Rich your time is up.

I hope there are a lot more banners next match!...

Given the response to the first one that seems unlikely. Looks like the majority of disgruntled fans will show their displeasure by not turning up rather than making a protest. That will probably have more effect TBH.

You are indeed correct, it is a catch 22 situation

I believe it's 6 including the play off game.

2/8
3/11
9/18

I hope the banners are put away during the game. I can understand before the game and after.

I think at the end of the Leeds game how majority of the supporters left right on the hooter (or before) was a major surprise to me. Nearly every game in 2009 & 2010 at home a good number of supporters stayed behind to appauld the team win or lose. So that shows that majority of supporters are fed up. The shop after the Leeds game was a lot quieter then usual. No surprise there I know but the board will notice less money coming in.