It most certainly does. That's why people by shares and invest; to have a say and have a degree of control to facilitate some form of return.

If I buy a meal, car, house, club or whatever I am entitled to an opinion. I'm pretty certain Ancelotti has never turned to Abramovic and said "your money doesn't entitle you to an opinion"

We are entitled to an opinion whether we spend money or we don't. It's a right and it's natural. That's a very strange statement you've made.

Sporting Life takes its content from the Press Association, so their copy is written from a neutral angle. Word must be spreading.

What a fool.

I'm sorry, I must of missed the pass holder share issue the club put forward. Of course everybody's entitled to an opinion, I meant one that counted.

There wouldn't be a club without the current board, regardless of us fans.

Agar is another that talks a good game like Steve Ma and Paul Cullen. I remember S Mac telling all and sundry to lay off Peter Sharp and he got to sack a few weeks later.

Their would be a club. Maybe not a SL club but their would be a club.

I agree on that, but its not really the argument.

No sporting club would exist without fans. Whats the point of being a fan if you dont have an opinion and voice it?

But this thread is about peoples opinions that count, and Nathan Browns is held higher than a disgruntled fan.

Lets hope Kath and the board listen to Nathan Brown then

Held higher by who?

So if gates fall by a few thousand the board wont sack Agar because Nathan Brown doesn't agree?

You're taking it to the extreme, 3 games is too early to judge how the season will pan out in people who are highly regarded within the games opinion.

But, don't forget that he was nominated for ([iwas it?[/i) coach of the year, and he was being head hunted for the England squad.