Sammut is 23!

I'd have em both over the current lot we have!

By "the current lot", I assume you mean our overseas players who are:

O'Meley
Berrigan
Fitzgibbon
Lauaki
Moa

Which 2 would you get rid of?

Noble didn't 'find' Sammut, he wasn't needed at the panthers due to the emergence of coote and wanted to get regular first team rugby. The Crusaders were the only team with money available, that wanted him, and quota space.

Don't spoil a good rant with facts. You should know by now that we should have signed any half-decent player who signs for someone else.

We should be going after a young half back though somebody like Rory Kostjasyn from the Storm.

We'd only ruin him.

The channel 9 commentry team was commenting how bellemy took cronk as a utility back and turned him into the form half back of the comp.

We couldn't even take a young talented half back and turn him into a good player.

Think Sammut 'could possibly' develop into a decent player but would rather wait a bit longer than 120mins before commenting further. First glance suggests he needs to realise there are 12 other players around him all contributing to the cause, very singular in his game play for mine and not what we require at the moment.

Not from a results perspective. But since we're miles off the top teams anyway, he'd provide more entertainment than the rest of the team. Genius individual try or monumental cock-up - never know what he's going to deliver on the next play.

There is sammut about him,I must admit.

Boooooooooooo

I think thats exactly what we need as our whole percentage rugby is boring to watch, easy to defend against but could be excused if it was leading to 'ugly wins' but it isnt.

whiting isn't a stand off, IMO.

I've always rated myler, half backs don't reach their peak till mid to late 20's.

Does the emergence of Sammut remind anyone of how good Dobson was when he came across?