Indeed, he was crap on the pitch so what made them think he'd be any different off it!!

Indeed. When I first starting watching the game 25 years ago I commented on the poor quality of the refereeing and got told that it had always been that way.

The difference now is that we're supposed to be a professional sport with full-time professional referees. And there's a lot more money at stake.

Rich knows the rules you can not have managers, players and anyone else connected to the game criticising the match officials. Now I agree and relate 100% to what he stated as do most of us, but he can not say it and be allowed to get a way with it. The club has access to the director of referee's and that should be there one and only point of complaint.



Football has different rules, lets face it the players ( wages) run that sport and criticising the ref on and off the pitch is mandatory. Complaining about referee's has always been the fans perogative and has gone on since the first time WEBB ELIS PICKED THE BALL UP

But this avenue is clearly flawed as nothing changes so what option do coaches have, I try not to get on Ref,s back but the inconsistency flowing into the game needs addressing, it is a problem which needs to be dealt with if the only way to do this is to speak out, so be it.

But in todays game the referees are now Full Time Professionals and they appear to be worse in the overall consistency from game to game and ref to ref. Senior was right when he said about Silverwood and the arrogance as Cummings and Co have this in abundance due to the fact the sport couldn't run without referees.

The fact we are still so short of refs for the SL tells its own tale about it being a closed shop etc.

The game is moving on every season yet the officials dont or WONT!

Here here!

You help with a youth team and you drill them not to argue with the ref and
they call him SIR ( even thought we all know his name is *@&*#~!$ ) . The club can bring this up at the monthly SL meetings as well, they after all pay the wages of these refs. I just do not agree with speaking out publically because all itrs going do is Rich will get a fine and he will make a public apology. The next time that ref is at what of our games he is ahrdly going to give us 50/50 calls is he.

Net result = zero

Away teams definately get the rough end of the stick

For me and I hear what Ian P has to say, but Agar has shown a bit of passion and some frustration at what was going on and I say good on him!!

Referee's as I have said before are now the power brokers in the game…no chance to criticise, no chance to comment, and immune from being sacked/disciplined! OK there are limited channels but when it comes to the fans views they are bombproof! When did you last hear of a Referee being brought to book by the RL?

The fact that it is also a closed shop, with just the chosen few allowed in, smacks to me of nepotism, and they really do need a shake up, although it seems that as far as the RL are concerned, they are totally above any sort of sanctions. Their actions of late at the play the ball concerning laying on are totally against the spirit that the season started with, and who knows what the 'Rules' will be this week?

Every home crowd boo's the opposition for laying on, why? Because they don't know what the tacklers are allowed to do and not to do!

Wigan got penalised on Friday for not playing the ball properly when the player concerned clearly waived his foot at it! What was all that about? If we went back to touching it with your foot everyone would be clear on the rule. It used to be the rule and players trained to do it properly it did'nt slow the game down, because they trained for it! Again as fans we don't know what the rules are, or we do, but we don't know what the interpretations to the rules are to be by any given referee on any given weekend!

Four things I think should happen

1 The referee's should have a clear promotional structure through the leagues so that the good referee's can break into the closed shop!
2 The rule book should be adhered to, to the letter, it might cause a few whistles at first but eventually everyone will know what they are doing on the field as we would do on the terraces.
3 Referee's should stand in line with the defending team and not two yards behind at the play the ball. then we would all be able to see when folks were on side. Some stand back some don't what chance have we and the players got!
4. The current referee's should not do everything, Video refs. should be selected in panels of three and be made up of ex players and ex referee's all trained up etc.
5. There should be a panel of ex players and referee's who watch games throughout the season and then make recommendations at the end of the years as to ways that the rules could be simplified FOR THE BENIFIT OF THE PAYING PUBLIC.. Rugby Onion has done this to great effect! Our game has a lot of grey areas as it it (Forward passes, knock on's and players playing at balls that are kicked at them, being just three) without us inventing more areas for conjecture by bringing interpretations to rules into it.

I don't say these things will stop every problem in the game but it would I think be a start.

just my thoughts! (Too much time on my hands)

P.S. Well done Agar!

Something has to be done about the messing about in the ruck it is becoming a joke and putting a major slur on what was once an open and exciting game to watch.

Rich will take his punishment if he has too, because that's him through and through, but Stuart Cummings really needs to take a long hard look at what is going on and especially what makes one of the most level headed coaches in the super league come out and say something is wrong!

Hull got penalised at every opportunity on Friday night and which was definitely aided by the Wigan fans complaining everytime they where tackled.

Cummings needs to get a serious grip before he turns this wonderful game into a farce that sends people away in their thousands.

He shouldn't be trying to influence an official at half time

Well done Rich you were exactly right to do so. Bollox to political correctness.

Quite right. I would sack him personally for not having the gumption to have it out with Alibert before the game kicked off.

Believed was the word used, where does it say he was trying to influence anyone?