Both games have good merits. Union, if there still exists such a game has become faster and more akin to watching league over the last couple of world cups. Players in both codes have to have fantastic skill levels and playing at the top level in either would take some b*lls.

You have to say though the other code is knocking spots of our game in the promotion of the sport. We even set back without so much as a whimper and allowed them to take the "Rugby" word as their own. No such thing anymoe as Union - just the Rugby World Cup, a competition that grows the game and will coninue to do so. Attatching the word League to rugby now makes it look an inferior brand somehow. Very clever marketing on their part. They even now have a "Challenge Cup" competition. No-one in league think to protect that name at some point? We get trampled on all over the place in respect of not protecting our interests as we should imo.

Each game has differing advantages and disadvantages for me playing the game. I loved playing league but had also enjoyed playing union for the last 8 years or so. Both are pretty much as physical as each other in differing ways, in most ways union is slightly more brutal. Think comments in books like has been made here at the start of the thread are slightly disrespectful.

I been watching rugby league since 1975 started attending rugby union matches in mid 1980,s used to go to the Circle to watched Hull East Riding play there before the merger with Ionians RUFC in 1989 the sport of rugby union has improved little bit better since the mid 90,s what it was years ago still prefer league in my opinion like both codes of rugby

Rugby League Hull FC supporter since 1975
Rugby Union since 1984 or 85 Hull East Riding and Ionians from the mid 80,s right up to when both clubs merged in 1989-Hull Ionians to this day sometimes I go to see Hull RUFC and Hessle

Watched West Hull ARLC from 1996 to2006.