In more ways than one.

If we do lose on fri...(and let's face it, it could happen), will the "this isnt Agars team" excuse be trotted out once more or will have been stretched too thinly by then. If, and only 'if' we do lose then you'd think pride would play some part in making our coach....(both of them) consider his/their own position(s).

now't to do with me I know , but in a way a win next friday would be a bad result for you i feel whereas a loss might get a few feathers ruffled.
I cant see agar/ sharp being got rid of till the end of the season though and, to be fair, you have had a pretty crappy injury run

The short answer is "no".

Agar will be here next season even if we lose every game between now and then.

Yup, I think you are right.

Three wins in sixteen and one (scraped) home win since February and he's still here.

Rule has already gone on the record and given the "it's not his team" excuse and the club's mouthpiece on KCFM is still singing his praises in the face of overwhelming evidence. I think it's a fair bet.

Did anyone listen to KCFM today? Surely Clark can't still be saying we're improving every week after today's shambles?

That one drives me mad.

A good coach will get the best out any team for one thing, besides which Agar has been on the coaching staff at the club for five years now.

^
This

I was at work this afternoon and was in the unfortunate position of hearing the whole thing. It was embarrassing, at best.

Took every opportunity to say how he thought "Rich" was the man for the job and how he would take us places etc etc.

Someone rang up and asked why Whiting was on the bench after last week's performance when some poorer performing players kept their places and his response was:

"I think that might change next week."

That doesn't actually answer the question as to why it ddn't change this week, though, does it?

Quite. Whenever a coach takes over a side there will be a number of players they did not sign. If they feel that we should all sit on our hands for 18 months until players come out of contract before we get anything like a decent performance, they are kidding themselves.

If I start managing a new department at work, I don't get to lose all the staff and start again. I have to get results with the personnel at my disposal.

brown and smith have both taken on someone else's team and done a hell of a lot better than agar

exactly

pay for a top coach and better performance is what you get, why our board fail to notice this repeatedly i dont know