I do

Nail on the head.

It appears to be better than yours.

He's been in charge for a year, not 11 games.

I'm judging him on the 28 games he' been in charge since Sharp was sacked. We've lost 16 of them, he has a worse record than either Kear or Sharp, both of whom also had to cope with injuries in the team.

Well said

And remember... 11 games and we're only 6 points off the top of the league and 2 off second...

Really? Do you not understand that the same performance against different opponents may actually result in different scorelines? That an identical performance against, let's say Skirlaugh and the Australian national team, is likely to result in differing scorelines? I think you need to go back to bed until you wake up properly sunshine

You can't possibly go on last year it wasn't his team, and to an extent neither is this years. If you go on last year then he also got us to a cup final despite the injuries. Good effort in my book.

Sharpe was sacked for less,he had the dressing room,worse injuries and it wasnt his team either.

Agar is inept and bullet bonce can go with him.

Sharp i agree with you on, but not agar. How do you know he hasn't got the dressing room? Last season was sharps team. He recruited virtually all our quota. Dykes, Berrigan, Cusack, Byrne.

Excellent, then at the current win/loss ratio (43%-57%) be waiting 9ish games to get those 6 points, and 3 games to get the next 2. Reckon the rest of the league will wait for us?

Spoil sport

Thanks for your concern - two points, even if we did play poorly, will do me. Which is two more than Leeds and St. Helens managed this weekend.

Nice backtrack