Yup. (you seem to be under the impression I'm defending him, or saying he is faultless. Not to sure why you think I should believe that, its obviously not a sensible viewpoint to have).

(Cooke was down to Plumber as well)

If I just walk into your house and you didnt want me to is that a crime or not?

If you came into my house without breaking the door down I imagine I would have a very hard time getting you convicted of breaking the door to my house down.'"

Who said anything about breaking your door down ?
I just wanted to know if that would be classed of breaking the law ...also you dont have to break a door down to get into a house they might have not locked it for a start!!!!


you mentioned breaking and entering in your first post, something he was never charged with.

Who said anything about breaking your door down ?
I just wanted to know if that would be classed of breaking the law ...also you dont have to break a door down to get into a house they might have not locked it for a start!!!!
Simply entering uninvited is only civil trespass. You would have to take out a civil NOT criminal action against the person(s) yourself. The Police would not get involved with it unless there was also a criminal act involved.

Now Now then, come on u 2 this is not a site for a personal slanging match.

Amazing how MEN are discussing some-one who first of all has so far not played for HUll FC.
No one has to defend him= not anything to do with us =and I am sure the MAGISTRATE who gives him his sentence tomorrow will look at the guy as to how he has conducted his life previously.
As a women I cant stand Bulleying men of any type - we dont know what happened in the marriage of Reardon and his Missus but i SUSPECT this could be a case of Hurt over Heart and if he had not taken his mate Leon with him it would not have ended in court
Hopefully Stuart Reardon and his former wife can now move on.

I agree it was about James Rule double standards thats my point he tells me its not right for a club to sign anyone like that (Greg Bird), as we are a family club and it would send out all the wrong messages,What is fair enough to me.

But then down the line the same year, to then go back on the clubs so called family club ethic of not have people like this in the club is a disgrace.

Its double standards at best I take it as he lied to me and just tried to fob me off like he does to most fc fans with his spin.

Mr Biff,

1) It depends, the law isnt that simple. In my line of work I have powers to go onto peoples property without their permission, for specific, well defined reasons. (and I'm not a baliff or debt collector)

2) He was charged with assault. (which in itsself covers a very broad range of possibilities)

3) the main difference that springs to mind is Bird hasn't been found guilty/plead guilty to anything yet.

Keep the boy Rule, he's doing a great job.

Plumber's apprentice !

So really Greg Bird has been tarnished by James Rule even though its not proven and he is denying the charge and he has his girlfriends backing as well to my knowledge?

But reardon has pleaded/found guilty of assault what i agree could be various things he could of done but with the judge saying there is a very good chance of jail it must have been pretty bad wouldnt you think?

I didn't hear what Rule said, so cant really comment on if Bird was tarnished or not.

If he's got a serious chance of Jail I'd assume he would have had to have pulled her arms off and slapped her with the soggy end given Mr Cockaynes recent precedent.